Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
John answered, “Master, we saw someone casting out demons in your name, and we tried to stop him, because he does not follow with us.”
The 12 (and later the 70) only started healing people and casting out demons AFTER Jesus "gave them power and authority over all devils, and to cure diseases".
The Holy Spirit had not been sent yet, so with what authority was this person acting?
Perhaps the most important verse in this brief exchange is the following verse,(vs 50)
And Jesus said unto him, Forbid him not: for he that is not against us is for us.
It's apparent that this individual saw Jesus cast out demons, and saw the disciples cast out demons; what he did not see was the Scribes and Pharisees cast out demons. The key passage to understand who can cast out demons is found in Matt. 11:24-30,"
But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, This fellow doth not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils.
And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand: And if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself; how shall then his kingdom stand? And if I by Beelzebub cast out devils, by whom do your children cast them out? therefore they shall be your judges. But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you. Or else how can one enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? and then he will spoil his house. He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.
The key to understanding this passage is vs 27,
And if I by Beelzebub cast out devils, by whom do your children cast them out? therefore they shall be your judges.
Jesus is throwing their charge of "...he casts out demons by the Prince of demons" back in their face; He is saying, 'Ok, if I follow your argument of casting out demons by the Prince of demons, by what name are you or your followers casting demons by? They will tell you if you are right or not.'
The Truth of the Matter is they did not cast out demons, neither they nor their followers. And then to show them exactly who it was that demons were cast out by, He says,(vs 28)
But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you.
The conclusion is therefore, whoever would cast out demons does so by the Spirit of God, this is the ministry of the Kingdom of God that Jesus and His disciples revealed.
The following verse reveals the instance of the man the disciples were trying to restrain from casting out demons,(vs 30}
"He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad."
The Scribes and Pharisees who not with Him and were against Him were "scattering abroad". The man that was casting out demons in Jesus's name was "with Him and gathering". Hence, Jesus could say about him,(Mk. 9:39-40}
But Jesus said, Forbid him not: for there is no man which shall do a miracle in my name, that can lightly speak evil of me. 40 For he that is not against us is on our part.
Although he didn't "follow Jesus" the same way His disciples did, he was "for Him" and obviously casting out demons in Jesus's name through the power of the Holy Spirit. To this Jesus's message was "Forbid him not".
The assumption that one requires divine authority to exorcise demons, cure infirmities, or perform miracles does not appear to have been shared by biblical writers. There are several instances in the gospels themselves where individuals other than Jesus and his disciples are said to exorcise demons (e.g. Mt.7:22, 12:27; Lk.9:49) and other examples of people outside their circle performing miracles, the most renown being Simon Magus as told in Acts 8.
This continues the belief evident in Old Testament stories of magicians, sorcerers, future-tellers, and workers of the occult who were believed to exercise real power, often with God’s apparent approval.(1) Jewish sources contemporaneous with Jesus likewise reported the feats of the miracle-workers Honi ha-M'agel and Hanina ben Dosa. According to the Dead Sea Scrolls exorcisms were performed within the Jewish Essene sect, and Josephus likewise reported exorcisms following the ancient traditions of administering poisonous root extracts and making sacrifices.
Whatever one makes of these stories today, the biblical writers understood their world to be diversely magical, and many people were believed to have the specialized knowledge or ability necessary to perform miracles, including exorcisms, quite apart from Jesus. It is within this cultural context that many people may actually have first come to belief in Jesus as the Christ.(2)
References:
(1) B.A. Robinson, “Divination, Magic & Occultic Activity in the Bible,” Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. http://www.religioustolerance.org/divin_bibl.htm
(2) Ben Witherington, 'Through Christ-- the Magus.' http://benwitherington.blogspot.com/2008/10/through-christ-magus.html
For an exhaustive list of biblical reference to witchcraft, astrology and magic: http://www.bibleplus.org/witchcraft/witchcraft.htm
In light of all these answers, how do you explain Matthew 7:21-23 "Not everyone who says to Me, “Lord, Lord,” will enter the kingdom of heaven; but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven. Many will say to Me on that day, “Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?” “And then I will declare to them, “I never knew you; DEPART FROM ME, YOU WHO PRACTICE LAWLESSNESS.” Apparently people CAN cast out demons in Christ name that are not going to heaven! And if they were going to heaven at the time they cast out demons, how did they lose their salvation?
"he does not follow along with us", (Luke 9:49); Any conclusions that might follow would likely be invalid - because the text might be silent on the possibility that this person might have met Jesus before - or had been empowered by the Holy Spirit, (as others had been before)."opinion-based answers". For this reason - the question should be "closed" or at least fixed. Another Faulty Presupposition:"The Holy Spirit had not been sent yet"Sure, the Holy Spirit might not have been "poured out on all flesh" - as described in Joel, but this hardly means that the Holy Spirit was not present in individuals. Because of this, a reasonable answer cannot be given.