I was talking with somebody who believes that "Jerusalem" in Revelation doesn't really mean a City, but a person. One of the arguments was this:
In Revelation 21:9 says:
9 One of the seven angels who had the seven bowls full of the seven last plagues came and said to me, “Come, I will show you the bride, the wife of the Lamb.” 10 And he carried me away in the Spirit to a mountain great and high, and showed me the Holy City, Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God.
So there, it's clearly that is a temple, specially when you keep reading and it describes how the temple was.
Rev 5:6 it says:
6 Then I saw a Lamb, looking as if it had been slain, standing at the center of the throne, encircled by the four living creatures and the elders. The Lamb had seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven spirits[a] of God sent out into all the earth.
As in Rev 5:6 it mentions a lamb, but in reality is not a lamb, according to Christians, is Jesus. So if Revelation says a lamb, but in reality is Jesus, it's possible for the city not to be a city , but a person. I feel and I'm about 99% sure that's not true, but, I would want to understand it from a hermeneutic point of view. Thanks!