In Psalm 23, David talks about the Lord providing a "table" in the presence of his enemies. Just what does this table represent?

Psalm 23:5 (ESV)

You prepare a table before me
in the presence of my enemies;
you anoint my head with oil;
my cup overflows.


2 Answers 2


Psalm 23:5 You prepare a table before me...

[OP]: Just what does this table represent?

First, except in the most qualified sense, this is not what is in mind in Psalm 23:5 -


The word "table"

The Hebrew term for "table" is שֻׁלְחָן šulḥān (71× in the Hebrew Bible), still the common word in use in Israeli Hebrew. But in the world of the psalmist, it isn't certain whether this is a "slab top supported by three or more legs" piece of furniture. As the BDB definition makes clear, a šulḥān could be also be some kind of mat.

It is important also to note the distribution in the Hebrew Bible of this simple lexeme. It appears frequently as one of the temple accoutrements (e.g., Exodus 25:23; 37:10; 40:22; Num 4:7; etc.). Here, with the dimensions given and instructions for its transportation and use, it resonates with a "table" in the modern connotation (slab-top-on-legs furnishing). It is, then, a sacred item for use in tabernacle (and later temple, 1 Kings 7:48; cf. Ezekiel 41:22).

The other frequent context for this term is the "table" of a king, governor, or high official (e.g. Judges 1:7; 1 Samuel 20:29; 2 Samuel 9:7; 1 Kings 4:27; 10:5; Nehemiah 5:17): the place where courtiers, retainers, and guests ate from the king's (or official's) bounty.

Very occasionally, a šulḥān is found in private use, but this is rare (e.g. 1 Kings 13:20; 2 Kings 4:10). Possibly Proverbs 9:2 belongs here too, but this chapter's depiction of rival feasts looks much more like the "high status" situation, analogous to that of the royal or official court.

When we are confronted with a "prepared table" in Psalm 23:5, then (cf. Isaiah 21:5), we need to think of something like a religious or royal setting: something a cut above the ordinary, in any case.

"Table" in context

This brings us to the verse in question. As many commentators note, this is clearly hospitality language, in which the LORD is the "host", and the psalmist the "guest". With the preceding discussion of šulḥān in mind, it is clear that the "host" at "table" is likely to be a person of considerable status, and the setting that of the royal (or sacred) court most likely.

This makes even more sense of the "presence of enemies", as this is not a neutral feast, but rather a display of provision and largesse in which the host's favour for the guest is seen all the more sharply for having the "enemies" excluded and looking on. It is provision that implies protection.1

Kenneth Bailey develops the hinterground of the "hospitality" theme.2 He goes on to make the suggestion that since food preparation was traditionally women's work in the ancient Near East (and beyond, one might add), this incorporates a "female component" to God's character in the psalm. This might be slightly over-interpreting, but worth pondering all the same.


The "table" of Psalm 23:5 is a place of royal provision in which the Deity's generosity for the psalmist is depicted. It thus extends the sense of divine care experienced by the psalmist by adding another metaphorical layer to the pastoral (23:1-3) and pilgrimage (23:4) metaphors which precede.


  1. This is the insight of Andrew E. Arterbury and William H. Bellinger, Jr., "'Returning' to the Hospitality of the Lord A Reconsideration of Psalm 23,5-6", Biblica 86.3 (2005): 387-395 [or at JSTOR].
  2. K. Bailey, The Good Shepherd: A Thousand-year Journey from Psalm 23 to the New Testament (SPCK, 2015), see esp. pp. 54-57.
  • +1. Fine answer. I've heard Ken Bailey preach on a couple of occasions. He has some fascinating insights borne of extensive research, as well as many years spent in the Middle East. A younger, though equally insightful Bible teacher is Ray Vanderlaan, whose video series "That the World May Know" is filled with insights on ANE culture, and the series sheds much needed light on biblical content. I also commend to you a little book written by G. Christian Weiss, called "Insights Into Bible Times and Customs," which the Back to the Bible Broadcast published back in '72. Good stuff. Don Dec 29, 2015 at 16:28

I like the interpretation of Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible :

Thou preparest a table before me,.... In a providential way granting a sufficiency, and even an affluence of temporal good things; the providence of God lays and spreads a table for his people in the wilderness, and sets them down at it, and bids them welcome to it; see Psalm 78:19; and in a way of grace, the Lord making large provisions in his house for them, called the goodness and fatness of his house, and a feast of fat things; and under the Gospel dispensation, the table of the Lord, on which are set his flesh and blood for faith to feed upon; see Proverbs 9:2; and also in heaven, the joys of which are compared to a feast, and the enjoyment of them to sitting at a table, and which are prepared by the Lord for his people, from the foundation of the world; and of which they have some foresight and foretaste in this world; see Luke 22:30; and all this

in the presence of my enemies; they seeing and envying the outward prosperity of the saints, whenever they enjoy it, and their liberty of worshipping God, hearing his word, and attending on his ordinances, none making them afraid; as they will see, and envy, and be distressed at a more glorious state of the church yet to come, Revelation 11:12; and even, as it should seem from the parable of the rich man and Lazarus, the glory and happiness of the saints in the other world will be seen, or by some way or other known, by wicked men; which will be an affliction to them, and an aggravation of their misery; though here it seems chiefly to regard the present life. Some have thought there is an allusion to princes, who, having conquered others, eat and feast at a well spread table in the presence of the conquered, and they being under it; see Judges 1:7;

  • 3
    -1 for being a quote only answer. We are looking for original analysis here, which at minimum, means you need to explain why you agree with the quote. Even better would be to re-state the interpretation in your own words.
    – ThaddeusB
    Dec 29, 2015 at 17:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.