What is meant exactly by the "powers of the heavens" in Matthew 24:29?

Matt 24:29-30 (KJV)
Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: 30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

What are the powers of the heavenly bodies that could be shaken? Could this refer to a disturbance in the electromagnetic field or the forces of gravity perhaps?

An internet search of credible possibilities led me to some interesting information: National Geographic, Space.com

6 Answers 6


The full verse of Matthew 24.29 reads in Greek:

Matthew 24.29, NA28

Εὐθέως δὲ μετὰ τὴν θλῖψιν τῶν ἡμερῶν ἐκείνων
ὁ ἥλιος σκοτισθήσεται,
καὶ ἡ σελήνη οὐ δώσει τὸ φέγγος αὐτῆς,
καὶ οἱ ἀστέρες πεσοῦνται ἀπὸ τοῦ οὐρανοῦ,
καὶ αἱ δυνάμεις τῶν οὐρανῶν σαλευθήσονται.

Or in English:

Matthew 24.29, NRSV translation

‘Immediately after the suffering of those days
the sun will be darkened,
and the moon will not give its light;
the stars will fall from heaven,
and the powers of heaven will be shaken.

Background in the Hebrew prophets

The Hebrew prophets, in general, spoke in relation to events of their own times. When Syria and Israel were posing a threat against Judah, Isaiah spoke to that context (e.g. Isaiah 7-9). When Babylon posed a threat to Jerusalem, Jeremiah spoke to that. Their primary interest was in events that had national or cultural importance for Israel and/or Judah.

The prophets delivered their prophecies in various ways, but they were often rich in figures of speech, using (of course) common images from their culture to help their audiences understand what it was they were saying — such as street-corner prostitutes (Ezekiel 16), economically prosperous vineyards (Isaiah 5), or a devastating plague of locusts (Joel 1-2). But they also used hyperbolic, exaggerated pictures to stress the gravity of the events they had in mind.

One such hyperbolic metaphor was 'cosmic darkness'. Here are several examples of this distressful picture:

  • Isaiah 5.20; 8.22; 13.10,13; 34.4
  • Jeremiah 4.23-28; 13.16
  • Ezekiel 30.18-19; 32.7-8; 34.12
  • Amos 5.8,18-20; 8.9
  • Micah 3.6
  • Nahum 1.8
  • Zephaniah 1.14-16
  • Haggai 2.6
  • Joel 2.1-2,10,30-32; 3.15-16

And for good measure, a few examples from the Psalms:

  • Psalm 18.7-11
  • Psalm 97.2,4-5

The 'cosmic darkness' had a wide range of depictions, from something as typical as a thunderstorm, to something as catastrophic as a full-blown decreation of the universe. Common elements include:

  1. Dark clouds
  2. The sun being extingiushed, or disappearing mid-day
  3. The moon being extinguished, or turning red
  4. The stars being extinguished, or falling to the earth
  5. The earth being shaken
  6. The heavens being shaken, or collapsing

How did they use this picture?

We find this picture of 'cosmic darkness' scattered throughout a variety of contexts, across several centuries-worth of prophetic material. Obviously, a necessary question should be, How did they understand the imagery they were using? A minor detour is required to answer that.

The 'Day of YHWH' (or 'Day of the LORD') is found earliest in the book of Amos. However, based on how he speaks about this 'day', it is generally agreed the ideas Amos utilized were around for quite a while before he came along.1

We find the Day of YHWH idea used over and over throughout the biblical prophets, but there is little indication they thought history would grind to a halt on that 'Day'. An explicit example is found in Jeremiah 46, where we read about Nebuchadnezzar conquering Necho II, with this event called 'the Day of YHWH of Hosts' (verse 46.10). The 'Day of YHWH' label was used for events that would leave this or that nation undone, while the rest of the world marched on without them.

In most of the texts from the list I provided above, the 'cosmic darkness' is used in association with 'the Day of YHWH'. If Amos was the earliest prophet to use the Day of YHWH, he was also the earliest to use the cosmic darkness in association with it. The language of 'cosmic darkness' was carried along with the 'Day of YHWH' concept from its earliest recorded stage. This would mean the 'cosmic darkness' idiom was also being used for significant events — events perceived as God's judgment — that were not perceived as literally world-ending.

For example, one particularly poignant use of the 'cosmic darkness' used it for the destruction of Jerusalem's (first) temple:2

That crowning disaster went beyond anything that prophecy had to explain and justify in the past. It was experienced as a collapse of the ordered world itself. With the destruction of the Temple the divinely appointed order had lost its centre, the correspondence between heaven and earth had been disrupted. As he contemplated the ruins of Jerusalem the prophet Jeremiah felt that he was witnessing a return to primordial chaos:

I saw the earth, and it was without form and void;
the heavens, and their light was gone.
I saw the mountains, and they reeled;
all the hills rocked to and fro.
I saw, and there was no man,
and the very birds had taken flight.

Based on all of this, I would suggest a reading that makes the best sense of (a) the historical development of the picture, and (b) the textual placement of the picture, the 'cosmic darkness' was a hyperbolic idiom that described socio-political upheaval.

It was not a literal disruption of nature, let alone anything like the end of the universe, or 'a disturbance in the electromagnetic field or the forces of gravity'.

Do later Jewish and Christian speakers and writers continue using this picture in the same way?

This is the big question. When we find the idiom used in later texts, several centuries after the biblical prophets, did they understand it as describing 'geo-political upheaval', or did they read it as a literal disruption of worldly elements, or did they invest it with some other meaning?

Jewish texts

In the Greek version of Esther, the first additional chapter has Mordecai having a prophetic dream. In it, two dragons fight one another, and amid their combat Mordecai sees

every nation prepared for war, to fight against a nation of righteous people. Look! A day of darkness and gloom! Affliction and anguish! Oppression and great chaos upon the earth! ('Old Greek' Esther A.6-7, NETS translation)

The two dragons are later explained as symbolizing the conflict between Mordecai and Haman that arises in the book, with the 'war' and 'day of darkness and gloom' standing for Haman's decree that people may kill the Jews scattered throughout Persia ('Old Greek' Esther F.4-6). At least in this example, the idiom of 'cosmic darkness' is not far off from the meaning we find in the biblical prophets.

The book of Daniel, written in the early second century BC, contains just a hint of the 'cosmic darkness' concept, with its meaning being relatively close to the earlier usage. Chapter 8.10 depicts a goat's 'little horn' as reaching 'to the host of heaven'; it proceeds to throw 'some of the host and some of the stars' down to the earth. This imagery is immediately explained in verse 8.24 as symbolizing an evil king who would 'destroy mighty men and the people who are the saints'.

The later 2 Baruch, written about the end of the first century AD, also drops a reference to 'decreation' when talking about Jerusalem's temple being destroyed in 70 AD (see 3.4-9, especially verse 7).4

Christian texts

In Acts 2.19-21, Peter directly quotes Joel 2.30-32. Just how far he intends to go with this quotation is debatable, but at the very least the context has Peter applying the passage to events taking place at that very moment (i.e. Pentecost, circa 30 AD).

Hebrews 12.25-29 quotes Haggai 2.6, but we're provided with no historical context.

Revelation 6.12-16 and 8.12 use the picture in its most destructive form (the universe physically falling apart), but there is little agreement on what meaning the author intended to convey here, or when he expected it to take place.3

Outside of Matthew 24.29 (and its parallels in Mark and Luke), there aren't any more examples in the new testament. The few we do find are in such distinct and vague contexts, we can barely tell their intended meanings.

Jesus' usage of the idiom

The saying attributed to Jesus in Matthew 24.29 is quite similar to Isaiah 13.10,13 in the list above, so his phrasing was probably dependent on that particular example. (Many English translations will reference Isaiah 13.10 in a footnote for Matthew 24.29.) In fact, the Greek wording behind 'and the moon will not give its light' is nearly identical to the Greek version of Isaiah 13.10:

και η σεληνη ου δωσει το φως αυτης (Isaiah 13.10)

και η σεληνη ου δωσει το φεγγος αυτης (Matthew 24.29)

Matthew 24 has Jesus prophesying the destruction of Jerusalem's second temple (24.1-2), international conflict (24.6-7), and war in Judea (24.15-28). In terms of context, we're clearly in the same realm of thought: socio-political upheaval.

Based on how the idiom is used in the Hebrew prophets, and how it carried the same approximate meaning even through the first century AD, I think this is Jesus' intended meaning.


1 Michael Ufok Udoekpo, Re-thinking the Day of YHWH and Restoration of Fortunes in the Prophet Zephaniah (2010), p.204.

2 Norman Cohn, Cosmos, Chaos, and the World to Come (2001), p.147-148.

3 My personal thought is that John had in mind the collapse of the Roman Empire, i.e. 'the beast', and that he did not expect the universe to literally fall apart at that time, since he portrays history as marching on for quite some time even when 'the beast' is defeated (cf. Revelation 19-20).

4 The author takes on the identity of Jeremiah's secretary Baruch, writing about the recent destruction of the second temple as if it was the first temple.

  • 2
    Nicely done! What do you make of the precursor language? Precise phrase (πᾶσα) ἡ δύναμις τοῦ οὐρανοῦ only (I think - not looked closely) in: 2 Ki. 17:16; 21:3, 5; 23:4f; 2 Chr. 18:18; Odes 12:15; Dan (Theod.) 4:35; 8:10; Matt. 24:29; Lk. 21:26; + variant Mk 13:25; and only plural in the three NT refs. LXX translates כִּל־צְבָא הַשָּׁמַיִם. Seems almost like "pagan" or counterfeit counterpart to יהוה צְבָאוֹת.
    – Dɑvïd
    Commented Jun 6, 2014 at 21:56
  • I do think 'the powers of heaven' in some texts refers to divinities / angels, which were sometimes perceived as allotted to (Deut 4.19) or representative of (Deut 32.8) the nations of the world. (e.g. In Daniel 10-12, the rise and fall of angels corresponds to the rise and fall of kingdoms.) However, the majority of 'cosmic darkness' passages in the Hebrew texts focus on otherwise 'natural' things (clouds, lightning, mountains, seas, rivers, etc.), and metaphorically so. Those are the text Matthew 24.29 is more obviously dependent conceptually, so I think that connection is the stronger one.
    – user2910
    Commented Jun 6, 2014 at 22:31
  • Excellent. But don't forget the sun, moon and stars bowing to Joseph and then the sun and moon at the feet of the woman of Rev 12. Both are further support for celestial symbols referring to socio-political powers and authority.
    – Joshua
    Commented Jan 20, 2016 at 12:11

Mark's answer above is very good, and comprehensive. But, if we look at "the powers of heaven" from a slightly different perspective it may shed more light.

How many powers are there in the heaven where God sits on His throne? Ultimately, there is one power in the most high heaven, and that is God.

So, then how can the "powers" - plural - speaking of more than one authority be referring to the literal heaven where God reigns?

The answer is that "heavens" had a metaphorical use in the OT, and it stood for the authority which kings had over their kingdoms. Just as God is the ultimate authority over all the earth, kings had a limited authority over sections of "earth" or "land" that they ruled. Their kingdoms were their "heavens".

Their rule could be shaken, moved out of the place of the other nations, overturned by God. Their "heavens" can be shaken. The heaven where God sits cannot be shaken.

Moses recorded God's warnings to Israel for the consequences of turning away from Him and in Lev. 26:19-20,

" And I will break the pride of your power; and I will make your heaven as iron, and your earth as brass: 20 And your strength shall be spent in vain: for your land shall not yield her increase, neither shall the trees of the land yield their fruits." (KJV)

Their heaven at that time, Israel's heaven was the rule and authority proscribed by God under the old covenant of their leader (Moses) and the Levitical priesthood. God was not going to remove His power from His heaven above the earth, but was referring to their ruling authority over their "earth". Their "earth" did not refer to the entire world, but only to the land that they inhabited.

So, when the prophets spoke of the heavens being shaken, we must first determine to which land or nation the prophet was speaking in order to know which "heaven" - political authority - and which "earth" - nation / land / territory - was being called to listen to God's warning.

By the same reasoning we can then know that "the new heavens and the new earth" (Isa. 65:17; 66:22; 2 Pet. 3:13) meant a new kingdom with a new king ruling over a new people / territory.

The new heavens and new earth was a promise of the new order God would bring into existence with Christ under the gospel, under the new covenant... His kingdom and His reign over His people. All those that are in Christ are in that new heaven and new earth kingdom, and it is not a literal kingdom on a literal land. It is spiritual; it is the new covenant under Christ.

Additional sources:

"Matthew 24 The End of The Holy City: Jerusalem and Josephus here

"Owen on the New Heavens and New Earth of 2 Peter 3:13" here

"Jim Gunter: The New Heavens and Earth (2006) here


7And war broke out in heaven: Miʹcha·el and his angels battled with the dragon, and the dragon and its angels battled 8but they did not prevail, nor was a place found for them any longer in heaven. 9So down the great dragon was hurled, the original serpent, the one called Devil and Satan, who is misleading the entire inhabited earth; he was hurled down to the earth, and his angels were hurled down with him
-- Revelation 12:7-9 (NWT)

It grew so great that it reached all the way to the army of the heavens, and it caused some of the army and some of the stars to fall to the earth, and it trampled them down.
-- Daniel 8:10 (NWT)

For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.
-- Ephesians 6:12 (NWT)

Conclusion: The war in heaven during the time of the end is an indirect reference to the "powers of heaven been shaken". That will culminate to the "stars=fallen angels" and Satan being thrown to earth. The arriving of these beings will be such a terrifying even that people's hearts will fail them. Of course that will be accompanied with physical phenomena such as the darkening of the sun and moon.

  • Welcome to BH.SE! Take the site tour to get a feel for what's expected. I have formatted the quotes so they stand apart from your own words. Don't forget to include the version of the Bible you are quoting from.
    – enegue
    Commented Jun 24, 2017 at 10:34

I think Hebrews 12: 25-28 shows that the"Powers of the heavens in Matt 24: 29 is talking about kingdoms. Especially. vs 28, "we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved". There are only 2 kingdoms in the universe. GOD'S, and temporarily, satan's. Matthew 24:29 is referring to the war in heaven in Rev 12: 7-12, just at the final 3 1/2 years. It's pretty plain as you read it. This is where the false Christ's and prophets of Matt 24: 23-4 come from. Sincerely John Semi off.

  • Your answer could be improved with additional supporting information. Please edit to add further details, such as citations or documentation, so that others can confirm that your answer is correct. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center.
    – Community Bot
    Commented Jan 1, 2023 at 14:00

Ephesians 6:12

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

I believe what is being described here is the events of Revelation 12 in which satan and his fallen angels are cast out of heaven and down to the earth.

Revelation 12:7-12

7 And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels fought with the dragon; and the dragon and his angels fought, 8 but they did not prevail, nor was a place found for them in heaven any longer. 9 So the great dragon was cast out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

10 Then I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, “Now salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of His Christ have come, for the accuser of our brethren, who accused them before our God day and night, has been cast down. 11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony, and they did not love their lives to the death. 12 Therefore rejoice, O heavens, and you who dwell in them! Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and the sea! For the devil has come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has a short time.”

New contributor
Scott C. Hansen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
  • Welcome to Biblical Hermeneutics! and thank you for your contribution. When you get a chance, please take the tour to understand how the site works and how it is different than others. I also recommend going through the Help Center's sections on both asking and answering questions.
    – agarza
    Commented 16 hours ago
  • Your answer could be improved with additional supporting information. Please edit to add further details, such as citations or documentation, so that others can confirm that your answer is correct. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center.
    – Community Bot
    Commented 16 hours ago

I would agree that a strict description of the term "dunameis" would refer to heavenly beings, agreeing with a similar usage in Ephesians 6:12. But to state unequivocally that this does not refer to corresponding physical destruction or desolation on earth would betray the previous verses of this text. The writer intended us to understand a physical destruction of this realm, as well as a shaking of the "powers" of heaven. Previous treatments of "cosmic darkness", or socio-political upheaval are not necessarily prescriptive for this passage, circumscribing its intended meaning. In this case, I would say that this is not hyperbole at all, but a physical literal representation. Therefore, I would argue that you are applying a figurative meaning which should not be preferable for this text.

  • 1
    Welcome to Stack Exchange, we are glad you are here. Be sure to check out the site tour and read how this site is a little different than other sites. In particular, pay attention to what constitutes a good answer and make sure your answer meets those guidelines. Please note that "showing your work" is required. Typically, we like answers that cite scholarly references and/or explain how your interpretation arises from the text. Don't just tell us what you know, tell us how you know it. Commented Jan 22, 2016 at 23:28
  • In this case in particular, you argue that this text should be interpreted literally. This may be true, but you never actually answer what "dunameis" specifically refers to. What heavenly being is this referring to? Yahweh? Angels? Other gods? Something else? Please feel free to edit your answer if you would like to provide that additional information. This looks like the start of a good answer, but just needs some expansion. Commented Jan 22, 2016 at 23:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.