Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 7 at 0:31 comment added Dan Moore Or that Paul laid before their eyes what had been previously written.
Nov 5 at 18:17 comment added Rob Callicotte A possibility of Paul painting a great picture of the cross with special, artful language is less likely in light of what Paul said to the Corinthians about this very subject: 1 Corinthians 1:17 - "For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of no effect." 1 Corinthians 2:4,5 - "And my speech and my preaching were not with persuasive words of human wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, that your faith should not be in the wisdom of men but in the power of God."
Nov 5 at 18:06 comment added Rob Callicotte Could be interpreted as if exquisite speaking, but Paul did not do this. ὀφθαλμοὺς is frequently used as physical eyes'-appears to mean some had been at Jesus' crucifixion. "οἷς κατ᾽ ὀφθαλμοὺς . . Χριστὸς προεγράφη was proclaimed or set forth publicly, Ep.Gal.3.1," - Liddell & Scott biblehub.com/interlinear/galatians/3-1.htm
Nov 4 at 7:13 comment added Dan Moore @Rob Callicote. Yes, we should be open to the possibility that some might have seen the crucifixion. But granting such, what are you suggesting relative to the use of proegraphē?
Nov 3 at 13:16 comment added Rob Callicotte Should we take into consideration the letter from Paul to Galatia was likely a very early document and, if so, we should also include this word prographō as illustrated here by @Dan Moore the possibility of some at Galatia having seen Jesus crucified?
Apr 29 at 2:19 vote accept Dan Moore
Apr 28 at 14:16 history edited Dan Moore CC BY-SA 4.0
added 20 characters in body
Apr 28 at 13:20 history answered Dan Moore CC BY-SA 4.0