Timeline for Does the Sermon on the Mount say women may not divorce their husbands for adultery?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 at 11:03 | answer | added | Michael | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 12 at 21:34 | answer | added | Dottard | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 12 at 20:47 | comment | added | EvilSnack | When the Israelites had the power to impose the death penalty (i.e., were not under foreign rule), divorce in the case of adultery was less of an issue, because adulterers were to be put to death; the betrayed spouse became a widow or widower and divorce was moot. | |
| Mar 12 at 20:31 | comment | added | supercat | Paternity was established by requiring that married women engage in relations exclusively with their respective husbands. Reliable establishment of maternity, by contrast, did not require any such social construct, since any child a woman bears was essentially guaranteed to be her biological offspring. Thus, the crime of adultery was limited to relations between a married woman and a man other than her husband. | |
| Mar 12 at 19:34 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Mar 12 at 19:11 | answer | added | Jason_ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 12 at 16:00 | answer | added | Dan Fefferman | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 12 at 14:33 | answer | added | Nigel J | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 12 at 11:52 | history | edited | Mr. Boy |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 12 at 11:38 | history | migrated | from christianity.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Mar 12 at 11:34 | history | asked | Mr. Boy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |