Timeline for Do the Stars in Genesis 1 support an allegorical view on the Creation account
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2023 at 20:41 | comment | added | Revelation Lad | @Dieter Thank you. I have come to recognize the fact that in some cases downvotes from some are worth much more than the upvotes. | |
| Oct 24, 2023 at 17:41 | comment | added | Dieter | Unfortunately, an immediate single down vote seems obligatory. I've been advocating here that any down vote should include the courtesy of an explanatory comment (as I've done myself below). It's always been my position that someone's unsupported assertion does not constitute irrefutable proof. I'd also add that I've been deeply disappointed after following up on some academically accepted "truths" on both extremes of biblical minimalism and biblical sensationalism, particularly in light of recent archaeological discoveries. | |
| Oct 24, 2023 at 15:40 | comment | added | Revelation Lad | My faithful and precious Downvoters. What do you find most offensive? (1) My belief God can use unscientific people to record scientific truths? (2) My encouragement to point out to the believers in science how the sequences they believe are theoretical truth agree with the sequence God recorded as absolute truth? [I realize the "offensive" nature of this type of encouragement, but what is more offensive, a denial the Word of God is truth yet using the truth in the Word of God to proclaim a scientific truth?] | |
| Oct 24, 2023 at 14:17 | history | answered | Revelation Lad | CC BY-SA 4.0 |