Timeline for Have there been any arguments to say 2nd Peter 3:16 is NOT calling Paul’s letters scripture?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25 at 21:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 28 at 20:06 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Mar 30 at 19:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 29 at 18:30 | answer | added | Rob | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jan 15 at 2:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Dec 16, 2023 at 1:08 | answer | added | Ruminator | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 15, 2023 at 18:08 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 17, 2023 at 17:06 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 18, 2023 at 16:48 | history | edited | Michael16 |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 17, 2023 at 22:18 | answer | added | Dottard | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 17, 2023 at 20:24 | comment | added | Luke Hill | @DanFefferman Right, for the sake of this question I'm assuming 2nd Peter has traditional authorship and is not a forgery 👍 | |
| Jul 17, 2023 at 19:42 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 1, 2023 at 3:05 | |||||
| Jul 17, 2023 at 19:24 | comment | added | Nigel J | @DanFefferman . . . . and thus the disposal of both Paul's inspired words and Peter's inspired words is achieved with a single stroke. | |
| Jul 17, 2023 at 17:36 | comment | added | Dan | γραφὰς exclusively refers to "Scriptures" in the NT, although the word itself has a broader meaning of "writings" elsewhere. With that said, the corpus being referred to is perhaps broader than what is today considered "canonical" (e.g., James 4:5). | |
| Jul 17, 2023 at 16:33 | comment | added | Dan Fefferman | Besides the question of what the author meant by "other scriptures" is the question of whether the author is actually Peter or not. Indeed, the treatment of Paul's letters as scripture is one argument for a late date of the epistle, implying that it was not written by Peter himself. | |
| Jul 17, 2023 at 16:05 | answer | added | Michael16 | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jul 17, 2023 at 14:36 | history | asked | Luke Hill | CC BY-SA 4.0 |