Skip to main content
19 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 9, 2023 at 15:25 comment added grammaplow You yourself quote Jer8:13 why doesn't it fit as a symbolic act showing the power of Jesus as the equal to god that striped fig tree of fruit but also of leaves and then giving away things that he previously gave to jews? And then he says with faith you can move a mountain (holy place for Zeus or Yahweh or someone else?) into an ocean (dwelling of Poseidon?)
Jul 9, 2023 at 13:56 answer added Anne timeline score: 2
Jul 9, 2023 at 11:55 comment added user11928 Jesus, because he was hungry, missed the target by choosing a fig tree without fruit?
Jul 9, 2023 at 9:50 answer added ארקדיוס timeline score: 2
Jul 9, 2023 at 9:09 comment added Michael16 I dont think he broke any law by destroying a tree, especially when he owns the whole world, everything is created by him. Follow the rule of weighing the law against each other. It was not vandalism against nature. If he destroyed a tree to illustrate a teaching and his power, it was justified. engediresourcecenter.com/2019/06/10/…
Jul 9, 2023 at 6:30 comment added Keenan Diggs Revenge for the garden when the fig leaves were covering his kids. The expectation would be the fruit of fellowship, but instead, He found leaves and emptiness. The event preserved for its symbolism.
Jul 9, 2023 at 4:50 comment added user11928 Did Jesus break the mitzvot (613) by transforming the fig tree?
Jul 9, 2023 at 4:17 comment added Michael16 Just search for the duplicates thoroughly before making a topic. The fruitless tree is cursed and punished,so will man.
Jul 9, 2023 at 4:12 comment added user11928 G03371 μηκετι meketi from 3361 and 2089; adverb 1) no more; no longer; from now on. So, the idea of Figueira being productive is totally admissible.
Jul 9, 2023 at 4:02 comment added Michael16 To demonstrate the judgment of God to man by this example.
Jul 9, 2023 at 3:31 comment added user11928 μηκέτι ἐκ σοῦ καρπὸς γένηται εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα (Matt. 21:19) and μηκέτι εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα ἐκ σοῦ μηδεὶς καρπὸν φάγοι (Mk. 11:14): "Let no fruit ever grow on you again!" (Matt. 21:19) and "May no one ever eat fruit from you again!" (Mark 11:14) does not mean that the fig tree is sterile or productive,however, if she was already sterile, why would Jesus make her redundantly sterile?
Jul 9, 2023 at 3:13 review Close votes
Jul 14, 2023 at 3:02
Jul 9, 2023 at 3:11 comment added user11928 For Figs that have hung through the winter were not at all associated with a tree's being in leaf, but might also be found on trees without leaves; the leafy tree promised summer figs, but had none.
Jul 9, 2023 at 3:07 comment added user11928 the fruitlessness of the tree would appear quite natural, and therefore not be justified as an occasion for cursing it
Jul 9, 2023 at 3:05 comment added user11928 since the tree had leaves, which in fact in the case of fig-trees come after the fruits, they are different questions.
Jul 9, 2023 at 2:58 comment added Michael16 Duplicate and also opinion based. Lacking fruit means being unproductive. Leaf does not mean produce but fruits.
Jul 9, 2023 at 2:58 comment added Michael16 Does this answer your question? Why would Jesus look for figs out of season?
Jul 9, 2023 at 2:48 comment added user11928 Codex Vercellensis, the Earliest Surviving Manuscript of the Old Latin Gospels, and Codex Veronensis have as a variant respectively the phrase (non enim erat tempus ficus) and (non erat enim tempus ficuum) for Mark 11:13
Jul 9, 2023 at 1:52 history asked user11928 CC BY-SA 4.0