Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 10 at 12:11 answer added Michael timeline score: 0
Dec 1, 2022 at 18:48 comment added user33515 Yeah, that's not the original. Strongs is based on the Masoretic Text and a manuscript from around the 11th century AD (Leningrad Codex). We don't have the original and even Jewish scholars will admit that the Masoretic Text is mangled and meaningless in many places (see, e.g., Oxford Jewish Study Bible). Few Bibles show this - the RSV is an exception. You might compare with the Septuagint for clarity. It's true that it is a translation, but it is by Jews and points to a proto-original text that is older than the Masoretic by around a millennium.
Dec 1, 2022 at 12:35 comment added user44949 Point noted, the Hebrew from Strongs
Nov 29, 2022 at 23:43 comment added user33515 "... in the original Hebrew" - Where did you find the original Hebrew? We have the Masoretic Text, but not the original Hebrew.
Oct 22, 2022 at 12:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackBibleHerm/status/1583790272307077121
Oct 22, 2022 at 1:34 answer added Nhi timeline score: 0
Oct 17, 2022 at 2:19 history edited user44949 CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Oct 16, 2022 at 16:24 answer added Biblasia timeline score: 0
Oct 15, 2022 at 19:25 review Close votes
Oct 20, 2022 at 3:01
Oct 15, 2022 at 14:25 answer added Iñaki Viggers timeline score: 4
Oct 15, 2022 at 13:51 answer added Anne timeline score: 1
Oct 15, 2022 at 8:37 answer added Dottard timeline score: 2
Oct 15, 2022 at 2:06 history edited agarza CC BY-SA 4.0
fixed formatting
S Oct 14, 2022 at 23:09 review First questions
Oct 15, 2022 at 2:06
S Oct 14, 2022 at 23:09 history asked user44949 CC BY-SA 4.0