The Roman Law was one of the most advanced legal systems of its time, developed democratically by Roman politicians. It dates back to as early as 450BC, when a set of laws was inscribed on 12 bronze tablets called "The Twelve Tables". This was the first step towards protecting the rights of all citizens and allowing wrongs to be redressed through precisely-worded written laws that were known to everybody. Consequently, the Roman approach to law became a model followed by many subsequent civilizations right up to the present day.

While the Jews might have hated the Romans, it was not an excuse to offend the Roman law. In every society, there was a social binding contract amongst people to maintain stability. God is a covenant keeper, and if the Jews did not keep the social binding contract (Roman Law), in the same way, they would be partially obedient to God instead of fully submitted to the covenant.

When Peter and Paul requested the Jews to submit themselves to the Roman Law, claiming that it punished the evildoers, but also "praise" the good, it indicated that the law was fair amongst ordinary people. There is no need to argue exceptions, for exceptions always exist to this day.

The Roman Law was one of the most advanced legal systems of its time, emerged through democratic processes led by Roman politicians. Its original trace back to 450BC when a pivotal moment occurred: the inscribing of laws onto 12 bronze tablets known as "The Twelve Tables". These tablets marked the initial step towards safeguarding the rights of all citizens and providing a framework for addressing grievances through precisely-worded written laws accessible to everyone. As a result, the Roman legal approach became a model followed by many subsequent civilizations, persisting even into the present day.

Despite the hate from the Jews towards the Romans, it did not excuse disregarding Roman law. Across societies, a social contract existed among people to maintain stability. In this context, God's role as a covenant keeper underscores the importance of adhering to this social contract - akin to the Roman Law. Failing to uphold this binding agreement would render partial obedience to God rather than full submission to the covenant.

When Peter and Paul urged the Jews to comply with Roman Law, they emphasized that it not only punished the evildoers but also recognized and upheld the virtuous. This stance reflected the law's fairness in its application to ordinary people. While exceptions may arise, the enduring principle remains for exceptions exist in every legal system.

The Roman Law by that time was the most advanced legal system developed democratically by Roman politicians in those day. It started as early as 450BC, a set of laws inscribed on 12 bronze tablets called "The Twelve Tables". It was a first step which would allow the protection of the rights of all citizens and permit wrongs to be redressed through precisely-worded written laws known to everybody. Consequently, the Roman approach to law would later become the model followed by many subsequent civilizations right up to the present day. (extracted from World History Encyclopedia website)

The Jews might hate the Romans, but it was not an excuse to offend the law. In every society, there was a social binding contract amongst people to maintain the stability. God is a covenant keeper, if the Jews did not keep the social binding contract (Roman Law), would they keep their covenant with God?

When Peter and Paul requested the Jews to submit themselves to the Roman Law, claiming it punished the evildoers, but it "praise" the good as well, indicated that the law was fair amongst ordinary people. There is no need to argue exceptions, for exceptions always exist to this day.

The Roman Law was one of the most advanced legal systems of its time, developed democratically by Roman politicians. It dates back to as early as 450BC, when a set of laws was inscribed on 12 bronze tablets called "The Twelve Tables". This was the first step towards protecting the rights of all citizens and allowing wrongs to be redressed through precisely-worded written laws that were known to everybody. Consequently, the Roman approach to law became a model followed by many subsequent civilizations right up to the present day.

While the Jews might have hated the Romans, it was not an excuse to offend the Roman law. In every society, there was a social binding contract amongst people to maintain stability. God is a covenant keeper, and if the Jews did not keep the social binding contract (Roman Law), in the same way, they would be partially obedient to God instead of fully submitted to the covenant.

When Peter and Paul requested the Jews to submit themselves to the Roman Law, claiming that it punished the evildoers, but also "praise" the good, it indicated that the law was fair amongst ordinary people. There is no need to argue exceptions, for exceptions always exist to this day.