Timeline for Does Luke 1:1-4 prove that stenographers followed Jesus to record His words?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2022 at 21:45 | vote | accept | Cork88 | ||
| Jun 25, 2022 at 21:45 | history | bounty ended | Cork88 | ||
| Jun 25, 2022 at 21:36 | history | edited | Dottard | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Further explanation
|
| Jun 21, 2022 at 4:21 | comment | added | Dottard | @Cork88 - as already explained, he may have use Matt & Mark and many more - his sources are un-named. | |
| Jun 21, 2022 at 2:49 | comment | added | Cork88 | How are “many” the actual “few” of Matthew & Mark? That’s not “many” people. I’m not sure servants of the word means the same as “obedient to the word” it might, in fact I checked a few references you quoted (Rom 15:18, Acts 6:7) I’m a little more persuaded that it means something else; albeit I can be wrong in this matter. | |
| Jun 21, 2022 at 2:04 | comment | added | Dottard | @Cork88 - That is correct - Luke produced the written record that we now read. He examine whatever records were available at the time (Perhaps Mark and Matthew's among other?) plus interviewed people and got information from the oral tradition such at was at the time. | |
| Jun 21, 2022 at 1:00 | comment | added | Cork88 | you sure about that? Even the commentator notes on a particular translation will say that “undertaken” or “taken in hand” to set in order a narrative, which implies a written record or account. What do you think about that? | |
| Jun 20, 2022 at 23:24 | history | edited | Dottard | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Jun 20, 2022 at 22:55 | history | answered | Dottard | CC BY-SA 4.0 |