Timeline for Does Job 32:1 also imply that his friends left?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2022 at 10:19 | comment | added | user49416 | I completely understand, as I have done the same several times. 👍🏻😎 | |
Apr 13, 2022 at 8:56 | comment | added | Lesley | Actually, I got myself in a muddle becasue I failed to set out my answer and review it properly before I posted it. It was not clear. and needed editing. Next time I shall take more care! | |
Apr 13, 2022 at 8:20 | comment | added | user49416 | Okay @Lesley, maybe I misunderstood your answer then. Thanks | |
Apr 13, 2022 at 7:24 | comment | added | Lesley | @AndriesStander - I said "To add to Kyle Johansen's answer, the King James Version indicates that Job's companions had not left him at this point." I have now added, for clarification, "They merely "ceased to answer Job." | |
Apr 13, 2022 at 7:20 | history | edited | Lesley | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarification
|
Apr 13, 2022 at 4:59 | comment | added | user49416 | Sounds interesting. Could you please elaborate on why you say they left in 38:1? Please show how this would harmonize with the fact that God only rebukes them in 42:8. | |
Apr 12, 2022 at 12:04 | history | edited | Lesley | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
corrections needed
|
Apr 12, 2022 at 11:55 | history | edited | Lesley | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
Apr 12, 2022 at 11:03 | history | edited | Lesley | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
corrected error
|
Apr 12, 2022 at 10:46 | history | answered | Lesley | CC BY-SA 4.0 |