Timeline for Does Job 32:1 also imply that his friends left?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2022 at 6:33 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Apr 13, 2022 at 6:33 | comment | added | user49416 | I see. Thanks for that important clarification about the Heb. not distinguishing between the two. It all makes sense now. | |
| Apr 13, 2022 at 5:54 | comment | added | Kyle Johansen | @AndriesStander I explain most of that, however Hebrew does not distinguish between "come" and "go" (it does between "come back" though). I would suggest that the translators use "go" because the sacrifice-collecting would take some time, and Job wouldn't necessarily be sitting on the dung waiting for them. | |
| Apr 13, 2022 at 4:45 | comment | added | user49416 | Kyle I am still thankful for your answer, yet I had a good look at 42:8,9 againand I would hate to sound stubborn, but could you please include in your answer how you deal with 42:8 that says they sould GO to Job. If they were all sitting in Job's presence, why would God say GO to Job and not COME to Job? Thanks | |
| Apr 12, 2022 at 13:38 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Apr 13, 2022 at 4:41 | |||||
| Apr 12, 2022 at 7:34 | history | answered | Kyle Johansen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |