Timeline for Anyway of interpreting adultery verses in Proverbs 2,3,6,7 & 9 in a more gender-neutral / gender-inclusive / politically correct manner [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2022 at 3:58 | history | closed |
Nigel J Hold To The Rod Michael16 Rajesh Jesse♦ |
Opinion-based | |
| Mar 23, 2022 at 3:58 | history | undeleted | Jesse♦ | ||
| Mar 23, 2022 at 3:58 | history | deleted | Jesse♦ | via Vote | |
| Mar 23, 2022 at 3:55 | comment | added | Jesse♦ | This question is explicitly asking for eisegesis which is the antithesis, opposite, and nemesis of the foundation of Hermeneutics, which is exegesis. The Question presents a conclusion first, and then asks for a study method to fit that conclusion. Therefore it must be immediately closed. I will consider re-opening it if you can rephrase the Question so it asks whether 1. an exegesis shown inside the Question can 2. arrive at an clearly-stated interpretation, and 3. asks for a better exegesis if not. | |
| Mar 19, 2022 at 13:24 | history | edited | user1338998 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Mar 19, 2022 at 9:48 | comment | added | Michael16 | Your misconceptions, misunderstanding and political bias cannot be used to blame God or the Bible literature. | |
| Mar 19, 2022 at 9:41 | answer | added | Kyle Johansen | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 19, 2022 at 3:46 | history | edited | user1338998 |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
| Mar 18, 2022 at 22:40 | answer | added | Sola Gratia | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 18, 2022 at 8:41 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 23, 2022 at 4:05 | |||||
| Mar 18, 2022 at 1:29 | history | asked | user1338998 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |