Timeline for Why are the "daughters of Jerusalem" always treated as grammatically masculine in Song of Songs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2020 at 21:56 | vote | accept | Julian Newman | ||
| Feb 25, 2020 at 17:35 | answer | added | tblue | timeline score: 2 | |
| S Feb 21, 2020 at 3:02 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Feb 21, 2020 at 3:02 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Feb 13, 2020 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackBibleHerm/status/1227970740785426432 | ||
| Feb 13, 2020 at 10:39 | comment | added | Julian Newman | @elika kohen Thank you. Yes, the LXX is often useful to consider. Did you envisage it providing some particular insight towards my question here? | |
| Feb 13, 2020 at 3:47 | comment | added | elika kohen | The Septuaigint's interpretation/translation of this might be helpful as well. LXX, Songs 1:6 | |
| S Feb 13, 2020 at 1:37 | history | bounty started | Julian Newman | ||
| S Feb 13, 2020 at 1:37 | history | notice added | Julian Newman | Draw attention | |
| Feb 11, 2020 at 21:00 | history | edited | Julian Newman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added part about normal Hebrew practice; moved and clarified part linking to other question
|
| Feb 11, 2020 at 2:36 | history | edited | Julian Newman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added connection to the Shulammitess's "noble people"
|
| Feb 11, 2020 at 1:27 | history | asked | Julian Newman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |