Timeline for Who believes, is baptized, and is saved in Acts 16?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2018 at 18:24 | comment | added | Ruminator | Of course, people strain at gnat and swallow the camel of "Covenant Theology" based on bogus covenants, etc. | |
| Sep 9, 2018 at 16:05 | history | edited | Ruminator | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2650 characters in body
|
| Sep 9, 2018 at 16:00 | history | edited | Ruminator | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2650 characters in body
|
| Sep 9, 2018 at 15:57 | comment | added | Ruminator | I've shown that Mikveh was a Jewish practice of the 1st century. Can anyone show that there was a separate, unrelated practice called "baptism"? John ran a Mikveh, not a "baptistry". They call him "John the Baptist" but he wasn't a Baptist, he was a Jew. Jews practiced Mikveh. "Christian water baptism" adds nothing to the faith in the propitiatory death of Christ. The believer participates in Jesus' death, burial and resurrection by being joined to Christ (one spirit, one flesh). | |
| Sep 4, 2018 at 12:21 | history | edited | Ruminator | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 336 characters in body
|
| Sep 4, 2018 at 9:12 | history | edited | Ruminator | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Properly cited Wikipedia
|
| Sep 4, 2018 at 8:31 | history | edited | Caleb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Sep 4, 2018 at 1:47 | comment | added | user2672 | But also it is unclear how this answers the question about the singular/plural switching in the relevant passages. And evidence for the claim it concerns miqwa'ot is also missing. | |
| Sep 4, 2018 at 1:45 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Sep 4, 2018 at 8:35 | |||||
| Sep 4, 2018 at 1:30 | review | Late answers | |||
| Sep 11, 2018 at 4:55 | |||||
| Sep 4, 2018 at 1:10 | history | answered | Ruminator | CC BY-SA 4.0 |