Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

1. Question Restatement:

A word for the fallacy of assuming whatever brings God the most glory is the correct interpretation a text?

2. Answer - "Rose Colored Lens Fallacy":

"Rose Colored Lens Fallacy:" This conclusion does not satisfy my expectations, and therefore must be wrong.

Yes, I just made that up - and that is a perfectly valid thing to do when naming fallacies - though the name of the fallacy must clearly, and adequately expresses the underlying fault, and is phrased appropriately given the context of that dialogue.

Yes, I just made that up too, (but it is logically valid).

But, to be boring - other "classical fallacies":

I started trying to list some fallacies that arise from this line of thinking, but there are a whole lot.

Eventually, depending on the Syllogism Form, I think one of these might end up present:

Intentionality fallacy – the insistence that the ultimate meaning of an expression must be consistent with the intention of the person from whom the communication originated (e.g. a work of fiction that is widely received as a blatant allegory must necessarily not be regarded as such if the author intended it not to be so.)

 

False attribution – an advocate appeals to an irrelevant, unqualified, unidentified, biased or fabricated source in support of an argument.

1. Question Restatement:

A word for the fallacy of assuming whatever brings God the most glory is the correct interpretation a text?

2. Answer - "Rose Colored Lens Fallacy":

"Rose Colored Lens Fallacy:" This conclusion does not satisfy my expectations, and therefore must be wrong.

Yes, I just made that up - and that is a perfectly valid thing to do when naming fallacies - though the name of the fallacy must clearly, and adequately expresses the underlying fault, and is phrased appropriately given the context of that dialogue.

Yes, I just made that up too, (but it is logically valid).

But, to be boring - other "classical fallacies":

I started trying to list some fallacies that arise from this line of thinking, but there are a whole lot.

Eventually, depending on the Syllogism Form, I think one of these might end up present:

Intentionality fallacy – the insistence that the ultimate meaning of an expression must be consistent with the intention of the person from whom the communication originated (e.g. a work of fiction that is widely received as a blatant allegory must necessarily not be regarded as such if the author intended it not to be so.)

 

False attribution – an advocate appeals to an irrelevant, unqualified, unidentified, biased or fabricated source in support of an argument.

1. Question Restatement:

A word for the fallacy of assuming whatever brings God the most glory is the correct interpretation a text?

2. Answer - "Rose Colored Lens Fallacy":

"Rose Colored Lens Fallacy:" This conclusion does not satisfy my expectations, and therefore must be wrong.

Yes, I just made that up - and that is a perfectly valid thing to do when naming fallacies - though the name of the fallacy must clearly, and adequately expresses the underlying fault, and is phrased appropriately given the context of that dialogue.

Yes, I just made that up too, (but it is logically valid).

But, to be boring - other "classical fallacies":

I started trying to list some fallacies that arise from this line of thinking, but there are a whole lot.

Eventually, depending on the Syllogism Form, I think one of these might end up present:

Intentionality fallacy – the insistence that the ultimate meaning of an expression must be consistent with the intention of the person from whom the communication originated (e.g. a work of fiction that is widely received as a blatant allegory must necessarily not be regarded as such if the author intended it not to be so.)

False attribution – an advocate appeals to an irrelevant, unqualified, unidentified, biased or fabricated source in support of an argument.

Source Link
elika kohen
  • 5.5k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 83

1. Question Restatement:

A word for the fallacy of assuming whatever brings God the most glory is the correct interpretation a text?

2. Answer - "Rose Colored Lens Fallacy":

"Rose Colored Lens Fallacy:" This conclusion does not satisfy my expectations, and therefore must be wrong.

Yes, I just made that up - and that is a perfectly valid thing to do when naming fallacies - though the name of the fallacy must clearly, and adequately expresses the underlying fault, and is phrased appropriately given the context of that dialogue.

Yes, I just made that up too, (but it is logically valid).

But, to be boring - other "classical fallacies":

I started trying to list some fallacies that arise from this line of thinking, but there are a whole lot.

Eventually, depending on the Syllogism Form, I think one of these might end up present:

Intentionality fallacy – the insistence that the ultimate meaning of an expression must be consistent with the intention of the person from whom the communication originated (e.g. a work of fiction that is widely received as a blatant allegory must necessarily not be regarded as such if the author intended it not to be so.)

False attribution – an advocate appeals to an irrelevant, unqualified, unidentified, biased or fabricated source in support of an argument.