Timeline for Is there any reason to think that Mark 7:19 has a later addition?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2021 at 23:14 | history | edited | curiousdannii♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 11 characters in body
|
| Jan 6, 2017 at 17:38 | comment | added | James Shewey | This answer also does not show its work which is a requirement on this site and does not meet our community's academic standards. You may improve this answer by editing it to add scholarly sources (commentators, historians, archeologists or other historical sources) supporting this answer. | |
| Jan 6, 2017 at 17:37 | comment | added | James Shewey | Welcome! We are glad you are here. If you haven't done so already, check out the site tour and read how this site is a little different than others. This does not appear to actually answer the OPs question: is there evidence that this is a later addition? (or evidence that it is not). Instead, this seems to be responding to another answer which is not correct in this format. | |
| Jan 6, 2017 at 4:11 | review | Late answers | |||
| Jan 7, 2017 at 12:59 | |||||
| Jan 6, 2017 at 3:55 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 6, 2017 at 17:38 | |||||
| Jan 6, 2017 at 3:51 | history | answered | Alex | CC BY-SA 3.0 |