Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:47 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/ with https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/
Dec 7, 2016 at 18:23 vote accept collen ndhlovu
Dec 5, 2016 at 21:53 comment added Joshua Thanks for reply. I did get the sense that was what you were saying but you just didn't seem to directly answer the main question before moving on to the rest of your explanation. And I'm sure I missed it too :) not sure what was edited but seems clearer. Hope some good came from my criticism.
Dec 5, 2016 at 20:07 comment added ScottS @Joshua: What I am pointing out is that Rev 21 (that was skipped by the OP) answers the chronology that is being summarized in Rev 22:12-15. The chronological events end in 22:5, but 22:15 is a part of that summary of the chronology about His second coming that was expounded upon throughout revelation. So while 22:15 is not itself part of the continuous chronology, it is referencing back to that chronology. I just edited the answer to make that point clearer.
Dec 5, 2016 at 20:06 history edited ScottS CC BY-SA 3.0
Clarified relation of Rev 22:15
Dec 5, 2016 at 19:56 history edited ScottS CC BY-SA 3.0
Clarified relation of Rev 22:15
Dec 5, 2016 at 19:00 comment added Joshua No offense but it seems like in your haste to use this to support eternal conscious torment you have missed the context of the Rev 22 statements. That they are not in the same chronological narrative flow as ch.20. In the full referenced section Rev 22:12 Jesus says "Behold, I am coming soon" which makes no sense if you are trying to say that ch22 supports a continuous chronology (upon which your claim it supports eternal conscious torment/ECT). This isn't a comment on the correctness of ECT, but on the context of Rev 22 and its relevance.
Dec 5, 2016 at 17:42 history answered ScottS CC BY-SA 3.0