Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 9, 2013 at 20:51 comment added warren @swasheck - I was trying to point out that even if he were under 20, the odds of him having heard any of the early epistles is remarkably low
Jan 9, 2013 at 18:32 comment added swasheck I see your point. I thought that you were proposing that Timothy was in fact under 20 when Paul wrote him
Jan 9, 2013 at 18:22 comment added warren @swasheck - the first of the NT books was written ~49 AD (or, arguably, ~42AD - though those were letters to individuals or churches, not gospels). Paul wrote Timothy in ~65AD. There is no way Timothy could have heard any of the "New Testament" at his grandmother's knee unless at least the following happened: a) he was close to Israel, b) he is under 20 when Paul writes him
Jan 8, 2013 at 21:18 comment added swasheck @warren I disagree. The timeline doesn't add up in your current answer.
Jan 8, 2013 at 21:15 comment added warren @swasheck - it's a relevant comparison, not because the letter had anything to do with his age, but because of when it was written
Jan 8, 2013 at 21:11 comment added swasheck Timothy's age is a red herring. It has no bearing on anything because the writing of epistles was not bound to Timothy's age.
Jan 8, 2013 at 19:53 comment added Soldarnal Wouldn't Timothy's youth rather make it more possible for parts of the NT to be written even while he was a child?
Oct 24, 2012 at 14:09 history answered warren CC BY-SA 3.0