Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 27, 2019 at 14:31 comment added barlop @barlop de rossi apparently has a good list, and kennicott see hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/26210/…
Jan 31, 2018 at 16:22 vote accept curiousdannii
Jul 13, 2017 at 5:45 comment added barlop Thing is what manuscripts have those two verses? I'm aware that Ginsberg mentions one, described as Harley No6, from 1396CE
Dec 16, 2016 at 18:01 comment added barlop @AbuMunirIbnIbrahim ok though it's not in the LC! i.sstatic.net/r43J5.png
Dec 16, 2016 at 12:37 comment added user17080 @barlop The IDF standard issue (OT) is based on the Leningrad codex.
Dec 16, 2016 at 11:46 comment added barlop @AbuMunirIbnIbrahim so, targum aside since that's not hebrew, where did they get the hebrew for e.g. an IDF standard issue bible(assuming they have it in hebrew?)?
Dec 16, 2016 at 4:19 comment added user17080 @barlop The Jerusalem Tarjum (Targum) is an Aramaic translation, as you can see from my quotation. The Targum is a significant indicator of missing or extra verses in that it is a parallel text, like the Talmudic verse citations, the LXX, Vulgate and the Peshita. A suspected late scribal mistake in the MT MSS should always be checked against Targum MSS's first.
Dec 15, 2016 at 23:38 comment added barlop @AbuMunirIbnIbrahim but isn't the targum in aramaic not hebrew?
Nov 18, 2016 at 4:11 comment added user17080 The same error was not made in the Jerusalem Tarjum, which can serve as a cross check. It has "ומשבטא דראובן ית קרית דשזבות קטולא ית בצר במדברא וית רוחהא ית יהצה וית רוחה , ית קדמות וית רוחהא ית ממיפעת וית רוחהא קרוין ארבע". Surprisingly these verses are not even mentioned in the Hebrew University "Jerusalem Crown", but are printed as footnotes "בקצת ספרים אחר פסוק לה..." in the "Mikraot Gdolot" and Koren editions and in Israeli Defense Forces standard issue Bibles.
Apr 25, 2016 at 9:44 history edited Dick Harfield CC BY-SA 3.0
correction
Apr 25, 2016 at 9:40 comment added fdb I think you mean "These words do appear in", not "do not appear appear in".
Apr 25, 2016 at 2:04 history answered Dick Harfield CC BY-SA 3.0