Timeline for According to Scripture, how should we interpret Scripture?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:51 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jul 6, 2012 at 4:47 | comment | added | Bob Jones | @Jas hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/460/… | |
| Jul 6, 2012 at 3:59 | comment | added | Jas 3.1 | @BobJones RE: "I have shown that John got John 1:1-4 from Gen 1:1" - could you link it? I would be interested in seeing this. | |
| Jul 6, 2012 at 1:23 | comment | added | Mike | @swasheck - I am not fully committed to the order I placed these secondary bullets. I think I need to make better use of the original languages myself. The good studious people on this site are helping me in this regard. I love that this site has this emphasis. It distinguishes itself apart from other sites because of it. I am not aware of another site that has as many quality qeustions and answers. I would prefer my own posts to be closed in order to maintain the serious exegesis attempts on this site, if that were required. My answer is not intended to downplay the value of serious study. | |
| Jul 5, 2012 at 21:36 | comment | added | Bob Jones | "recognizing the gradual unfolding of the redemption plan in it." this is an apriori assumption. I have shown that John Got John 1-1-4 from Gen 1.1 and that plausibly, by the meaning of the words themselves, Adam knew the skins were a symbol of the death of the creator Lamb of God. | |
| Jul 5, 2012 at 21:35 | comment | added | Bob Jones | I would argue that Paul did not appeal to "bare nature" but in fact was making the point that "the natural man says long hair is a shame" and knowing that for the Nazarite it was his holiness (the spiritual interpretation) produced a riddle which must be answered. Christ bore our shame on the cross (symbolized by long hair), but it was not his shame, he was holy. | |
| Jul 5, 2012 at 18:16 | comment | added | swasheck | Good answer. I would, however, push back on the "original languages" section as it is substantially more important than is credited. I would, actually, swap 6 and 2 since there are fascinating grammatical nuances that may remain unrendered in English. | |
| Jul 5, 2012 at 5:42 | history | edited | Mike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
more garmmar
|
| Jul 5, 2012 at 5:13 | history | edited | Mike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
grammar
|
| Jul 5, 2012 at 4:59 | history | edited | Mike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
general formating
|
| Jul 4, 2012 at 23:11 | comment | added | Mike | @Jas3.1 - noted. I am usually tapping away on my iPhone and have to come back for clean up later. Good question it forced me to think. | |
| Jul 4, 2012 at 17:57 | comment | added | Jas 3.1 | Excellent answer. Thanks! One suggestion, though - most people won't read an answer this long, especially if it's not organized (with summary, titles, bullets, bars, etc.) You might consider organizing it a bit and pruning it down if possible so people will read it; I definitely think it deserves to be read by everyone who comes across it. | |
| Jul 4, 2012 at 17:52 | vote | accept | Jas 3.1 | ||
| Jul 4, 2012 at 15:57 | history | edited | Mike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Grammar
|
| Jul 4, 2012 at 15:50 | history | edited | Mike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Grammar fixes
|
| Jul 4, 2012 at 13:53 | history | edited | Mike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
significant edit
|
| Jul 4, 2012 at 12:16 | history | answered | Mike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |