Timeline for What evidence suggests that Greek was not Mark's first language?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 30, 2018 at 17:44 | comment | added | Sola Gratia | There is also a guy who recently posted here who has written a book/essay arguing Mark was written originally in Latin.. I'm not yet convinced, but it was definitely an interesting read. Not impossible either, if Mark was a companion of Peter at Rome, and who had a Latin name. In this case, the peculiarities of the Greek are accounted for by a rather rigid Latin-to-Greek translation. Also, Mark is more likely a summary of the prior Gospel messages, than they a 'copying' of him, something only really needed to establish the more 'primitive' theology supposedly in Mark. | |
Jul 30, 2018 at 15:12 | comment | added | Ruminator | Does this suggest that "Mark" wrote his gospel by his own hand and it was not subsequently edited? Not bad for a first draft! If he was a country bumpkin then it is a marvel that he can write in any language. But seriously, are we talking about defects or just dialectal concerns? I mean, not all English is spoken or written the same, even in a reasonably literate country such as the USA. | |
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:53 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://spanish.stackexchange.com/ with https://spanish.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Jun 27, 2012 at 1:59 | history | answered | Jon Ericson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |