Timeline for Could the Gospel of Matthew be dependent on Luke's Gospel?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/ with https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 28, 2014 at 14:01 | history | edited | Frank Luke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2044 characters in body
|
| Oct 28, 2014 at 13:15 | comment | added | Frank Luke | @user2754486, I am editing for the requested information. You may see how that fits in later. | |
| Oct 28, 2014 at 10:13 | comment | added | user2754486 | I think I am now likewise inclined. What is the correct remedy at this point? | |
| Oct 26, 2014 at 8:14 | comment | added | Caleb | I'm sure the names and facts involved here are relevant, but this answer seems too short on opinion to me. That may seem like an odd complaint, but as someone who is not an expert in this particular issue this answer doesn't help me gain any perspective. Are the scholars mentioned "respected"? Are they in the majority or minority? Is this just a few examples or an exhaustive run-down of the support? Are you able to draw a conclusion to the question title? | |
| Oct 26, 2014 at 2:17 | vote | accept | user2754486 | ||
| Oct 25, 2014 at 14:49 | history | answered | Frank Luke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |