Timeline for Is the Son of Man passage in Matthew 25 a reference to 1 Enoch?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/ with https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 16, 2015 at 23:34 | answer | added | justin Fehrenbach | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 15, 2014 at 10:15 | vote | accept | Susan | ||
| Jul 13, 2014 at 0:32 | comment | added | Susan | @Onlyheisgood - no, I hadn't considered that. The "son(s) of X" construction is such a common Hebraic phrase, and I'm not aware of it refering elsewhere to "X's words." If you know more about this and it's relevant to the question, I welcome you to contribute an answer. If it's not relevant to the relationship with 1 Enoch, you may want to consider asking a new question. | |
| Jul 8, 2014 at 23:33 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackBibleHerm/status/486654442675376128 | ||
| Jul 8, 2014 at 19:57 | answer | added | ScottS | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jul 8, 2014 at 19:39 | comment | added | Susan | @Frank Luke - thanks, I changed my links to that one. Since there are a grand total of 3 questions about 1 Enoch on BH.SE, I figured it would be nice for anyone interested to only have to deal with one set of numbers. | |
| Jul 8, 2014 at 19:35 | history | edited | Susan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited links and references to different numbering scheme
|
| Jul 8, 2014 at 19:16 | comment | added | Frank Luke | That verse is the same. There is indeed a different numbering scheme. neno.co.ke/bible/book/Book%20of%20Enoch/71/14 is like the one I had. | |
| Jul 8, 2014 at 19:07 | answer | added | Frank Luke | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jul 8, 2014 at 18:56 | comment | added | Susan | @ScottS - good point. The notion that a text (particularly one I think we agree neither Matthew nor Jesus considered scriptural - I like the reasoning offered here) might be referenced out of context doesn't seem totally far-fetched, though. | |
| Jul 8, 2014 at 18:33 | comment | added | ScottS | In that passage, however, Matthew is relating what Jesus is saying, so if a connection is at all to 1 Enoch 68, it is being made by Jesus (according to Matthew's testimony) in reference to Himself (which would seem to further complicate a possible connection to Enoch based on what you state is the identity of the son of man in that work). | |
| Jul 8, 2014 at 17:36 | comment | added | Susan | @Frank Luke - is 70:17 at the link in this question correctly identified with 71:14 in your answer? If you could provide a link to an online version using your numbering I'd be happy to change my link. | |
| Jul 8, 2014 at 17:35 | history | asked | Susan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |