Timeline for What is the original Number of the Beast?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2014 at 13:32 | comment | added | ScottS | I agree with @user2479 that the main point of the question is the textual variants that exist (and determining which is correct), which you do not address at all. | |
| Jul 4, 2014 at 7:43 | comment | added | Tau | And BTW, welcome to BH! We're a little different here, be sure to read the guidelines (hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/tour) before you ask or answer any questions-Thx! | |
| Jul 4, 2014 at 7:37 | comment | added | Tau | +1 for your answer(I do agree, although I think you're mixing literal and figurative examples in your last paragraph. However, the OP's question was about the "Original Number" of Rev. 13:18(666 vs 616) and to that you offered no explanation. I would suggest you 'amend' it and keep your + votes from being overwhelmed by - ones. | |
| Jul 4, 2014 at 7:23 | history | answered | Laurie Lombard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |