Jamin Greyless info
|visits||member for||4 months|
|seen||Mar 9 at 22:17|
Level 27 C++ programmer, and hobbyist indie game developer trying to go professionally indie. Check out my current projects at JaminGrey.com
|bio||website||JaminGrey.com||visits||member for||4 months|
|location||United States||seen||Mar 9 at 22:17|
Are there any rules on which things in Revelation must be interpreted literally and which symbolically?
Which part would you like more objective evidence for? Being consistent in interpretation, or letting the Bible interpret the Bible? I can't provide "evidence" for the need for consistency, but the hermeneutic I mentioned that I personally use is one that is fairly well known and encouraged by several large and well-known ministries (YWAM and IHOP-KC, for example). As for letting the Bible interpret the Bible, the Bible itself does this: Jesus says He fulfills the Law and the Prophets, and constantly quotes Psalms and the Prophets. Paul also quotes the Old Testament in his letters.