meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 4 months |
| seen | 10 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 30 |
please delete me
|
Apr 17 |
comment |
Does baptizing come after discipling in Matthew 28:19? I sense we're in the same boat, @Mallioch |
|
Apr 17 |
revised |
Does baptizing come after discipling in Matthew 28:19? added 43 characters in body |
|
Apr 17 |
revised |
Does baptizing come after discipling in Matthew 28:19? added 85 characters in body |
|
Apr 17 |
answered | Does baptizing come after discipling in Matthew 28:19? |
|
Apr 17 |
accepted | Does Luke's supposed profession matter when interpreting his work as an author? |
|
Apr 16 |
comment |
Does Galatians 6:9 contain a causality that could imply works salvation? NT Wright has an excellent perspective on this. |
|
Apr 16 |
comment |
How many common hermeneutical approaches are there and how do they differ? The diamond next to your name indicates that you may do as you wish :) |
|
Apr 16 |
comment |
How many common hermeneutical approaches are there and how do they differ? I'd already vote for this to be a wiki/sticky/whatever because it is both broad, and valuable. It could serve as an excellent reference point for any answerer/commenter who wishes to leverage/understand a particular approach. As such, it'll be a good living document as we have the opportunity to revisit and refine it. |
|
Apr 16 |
comment |
What are the possible interpretations of 1 John 2:19? @Kazark, thanks for making me a better answerer. |
|
Apr 16 |
revised |
What are the possible interpretations of 1 John 2:19? added 744 characters in body |
|
Apr 16 |
comment |
What are the possible interpretations of 1 John 2:19? @Kazark I agree with you ... but I think that the sense in which they were not of us is largely defined by the theological bent/bias/position with which one approaches the text. If it was truly that cut-and-dry, then there would be no debate. |
|
Apr 16 |
comment |
What are the possible interpretations of 1 John 2:19? That would definitely be reading the text from a CS perspective. |
|
Apr 16 |
comment |
What are the possible interpretations of 1 John 2:19? I agree that the ES laypeople are the ones who misunderstand the CS position. |
|
Apr 16 |
revised |
What are the possible interpretations of 1 John 2:19? added 187 characters in body |
|
Apr 16 |
comment |
What are the possible interpretations of 1 John 2:19? It's quite tricky. The pluperfect is pretty rare in the NT and so it should be given some consideration. The only verb in here that I see that is translatable with a "would" is φανερωθῶσιν (subjunctive). In fact, I am going to change my translation a bit to better reflect this. |
|
Apr 16 |
answered | What are the possible interpretations of 1 John 2:19? |
|
Apr 13 |
comment |
Does Luke's supposed profession matter when interpreting his work as an author? Love your answer, and will upvote it. Nonetheless, Luke as physician based on semantic analysis alone has since been disputed. As such, any conclusions drawn from the study of Luke/Acts that are based an a supposed profession as a "physician" are on some shaky ground. |
|
Apr 13 |
comment |
How should ἱλαστήριον (hilasterion) be translated in Romans 3:25? Though I'm not working on my PhD, I have had to do a substantial amount of translation for my coursework and thesis, which focuses on linguistic patterns of Luke within the semantic domain of possessions. We had to translate Romans, James, 1 Thess., and 1 John for coursework. |
|
Apr 13 |
comment |
How should ἱλαστήριον (hilasterion) be translated in Romans 3:25? This is a very true statement. There are certain stalemates in the process of interpreting the text that require a theological decision to be made. However, these are relatively infrequent. |
|
Apr 13 |
revised |
How should ἱλαστήριον (hilasterion) be translated in Romans 3:25? added 2134 characters in body |
