Reputation
397
Top tag
Next privilege 500 Rep.
Cast close and reopen votes
Badges
2 19
Newest
 Custodian
Impact
~18k people reached

Mar
15
revised Were Shem, Ham and Japheth Triplets?
added 3 characters in body
Mar
15
revised Were Shem, Ham and Japheth Triplets?
deleted 1 character in body
Mar
11
answered Were Shem, Ham and Japheth Triplets?
Mar
11
comment Were Shem, Ham and Japheth Triplets?
@PaulVargas i must admit i was just reading and realised it could mean he had triplets. will read your suggestion thankyou!
Mar
10
revised Were Shem, Ham and Japheth Triplets?
deleted 5 characters in body; edited title
Mar
10
asked Were Shem, Ham and Japheth Triplets?
Mar
10
revised Angel “marriages”, rebellious angels, and Genesis-Jude intertextual connections
deleted 712 characters in body
Mar
10
revised Why should an altar be made with uncut stone?
added 15 characters in body
Mar
8
answered Why should an altar be made with uncut stone?
Mar
6
comment What does the word “destroy” mean in Mathew 10:28?
it might be better for you, if you are interested, to read a scholarly work on the annihilationist position, so that you get a grasp of the position from a well reasoned and systematic approach. Edward Fudge's 'the fire that consumes' is a good recent work. :) God bless you!
Mar
6
comment What does the word “destroy” mean in Mathew 10:28?
@JonathanChell In retrospect i believe I was wrong on the 'accusative' comment, you were on subject, to the extent that you believe 'eternal torment' is consistent with your system. I simply believe that particular part is not what is taught in scripture. I understand the 'majority' of professing christians have hardly looked into the issues of interpretation in this area, and simply 'take for granted' the accepted interpretation. It behoves us all to diligently search the scriptures and accept nothing as 'given' until we have seen with our own eyes. Thanks for the offer but I think...
Mar
4
comment What does the word “destroy” mean in Mathew 10:28?
The Sovereignty and holiness of God in no way necessitates 'eternal conscious torment' if 'destruction' is the lot of the reprobate and that their punishment, the loss of life! The holiness of God does not require that sinners remain 'alive', in creation, without end. The opposite would be more consistent with the revelation of the Word to the extent that there will be an end to sin and sinners and 'all' things will be made new in the heavens and on the earth.The 'memory' of the end of the wicked is sufficient a lesson for all creation. "The wages of sin is death"!
Mar
4
comment What does the word “destroy” mean in Mathew 10:28?
I believe reformed is a weak word also to describe the state of the elect. I find it interesting that you lower yourself to a level of accusation rather than concentrating on the subject and arguing objectively. Its a sign of weakness and frustration. This is a complex subject.As to the glory of God I believe the doctrine of eternal conscious torment is a detraction from that glory to the extent that it is misrepresentation of the truth that God has revealed. I have no need to be associated with any organisation but so that you might understand that I understand the system but disagree on ECT
Mar
4
comment What does the word “destroy” mean in Mathew 10:28?
@JonathanChell "And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever". "smoke of torment" refers to the 'memory' of their torment. Their torment does not rise forever, it is the 'smoke'that rises forever. Such an interpretation is consistent with the doctrine of conditionalism. Matt 25:46 Of course if eternal punishment is destruction that lasts forever, that is an eternal punishment. As to 'Calvinist' I hope I never use a man to define my faith! The word is used to describe a system simply.
Mar
2
comment What does the word “destroy” mean in Mathew 10:28?
@JonathanChell Will God be angry forever Johnathan? I think you may have misunderstood me a little. I believe in hell. I believe the wicked will be punished there but not eternally. Revelation 14:10 only establishes the reality that the wicked will be in hell tormented in the presence of the Lamb, it does not establish the duration thereof. Such is established by other scriptures.
Mar
1
comment Angel “marriages”, rebellious angels, and Genesis-Jude intertextual connections
Scott I believe you will find that Enoch reports that the fallen Angels were imprisoned until judgement day, 1 Enoch Chapter 10. The spirits of their offspring (giants) remained upon the earth after their bodies were destroyed in the flood, restlessly wandering and are represented as demons in the N.T. See The Book of Enoch chapter 15: 8-12. If you find this to be an accurate assessment of the text you may wish to edit your answer.
Feb
27
comment Angel “marriages”, rebellious angels, and Genesis-Jude intertextual connections
"sons of God" are used in the second verse contrasting with the word "men" in verse 1. From a natural reading of the text and from natural sense of words and their combined meanings it would appear strange that suddenly at a point where daughters were being born that men suddenly saw that they were "fair". Did not men see they were fair from the beginning. Therefore the text indicates that something new occurs, somthing different. For this reason i believe it is important to use the words "sons of God" in the second central question instead of "men". What do you think?
Feb
27
comment Angel “marriages”, rebellious angels, and Genesis-Jude intertextual connections
@Davïd After reading through the question a couple more times I found one more issue that may need editing and your opinion before I do would be helpful. In the second central question we read "if yes, does that account tell us whether Jude thinks the "men" involved in the marriages of Genesis 6:1-6 were mortal or supernatural beings?" I understand that yes in order for Angels to cohabit they must become men. But I believe the emphasis is on their original state and for this reason the text in Genesis 6 appears to differentiate between men and angels to the extent that the words, cont...
Feb
27
comment Angel “marriages”, rebellious angels, and Genesis-Jude intertextual connections
@Davïd Yes your edit gave me a good lesson in presentation!
Feb
27
comment What does the word “destroy” mean in Mathew 10:28?
@JonathanChell What would ultimate separation from God be. In order for the sinner in hell to exist god must extend somthing toward them. Any extension by God to the creature must be seen as a connection and not a separation, no matter how small the extension of 'life' of 'existence'. "He causes His sun to rise on the righteous and the wicked". hell is also pictured as 'darkness' simply because there is no extension of the breath of God there, such a connection is severed completely resulting in eternal separation...death..non-existence!