Reputation
3,401
Top tag
Next privilege 3,500 Rep.
Protect questions
Badges
2 18
Newest
 Explainer
Impact
~131k people reached

Mar
2
answered Why does Jesus tell the Samaritan woman to “Go, call your husband”?
Feb
23
revised What is the context in Mark and Luke as regards the buying and preparing of the spices?
a couple errata
Feb
23
comment Concealing & revealing in Proverbs 25:2
I guess what I'm saying is that a proverb squeezes a great nugget of truth into very few words, but it doesn't squeeze everything! One "app" of searching things out is in matters of justice; another is in matters of everyday ethics; another is in not-so-common commonsense; another is acquiring a spiritual understanding which was heretofore a bit of a mystery; and so on. About God concealing sin; well, that's another app (see Prov 10:12; 17:9; and 1 Pet 4:8), although the second half of the proverb (i.e., 25:2) makes that app a little forced. (It's still true, however!).
Feb
23
comment Concealing & revealing in Proverbs 25:2
@Jas.3.1: One interpretation; many applications. Solomon, for example, searched out the legal, moral, ethical, and spiritual implications of the case of the two harlots who gave birth to two babies, one of whom died (see 1 Kings 3:16 ff.). You'll recall that one harlot did the ol' switcheroo (her dead baby for the living baby) and then had the temerity to tell King Sol the living baby was hers! Sol offered to divide the child in two, and the rest is history. Notice that "all Israel heard of the king's judgment . . . [and] saw the wisdom of God was in him to administer judgment" (v.28).
Feb
22
answered Concealing & revealing in Proverbs 25:2
Feb
20
revised What is “that day” in John 14:20?
minor word change
Feb
19
comment What is “that day” in John 14:20?
@Tau: I've added some "new stuff" which I hope addresses your concerns. Don
Feb
19
revised What is “that day” in John 14:20?
inserted some new stuff
Feb
19
answered What is “that day” in John 14:20?
Feb
19
comment Do the specific gifts the father gives to the prodigal son have any special significance?
@Caleb: Uh, please correct me if I'm wrong, but who was the teller of the parable? Hint: It wasn't Mohammed!
Feb
18
revised What does “suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin” in 1 Peter 4:1 mean?
major reorganization; corrected a few errata; eliminated unnecessary repetition; highlighted Bible verses
Feb
14
answered What is the accurate meaning of κεφαλὴ (kephalē) in 1 Cor 11:3?
Feb
14
comment What is John 15:10 really saying?
Good points. One thing seems to be missing. Jesus' most important commandment--and John his beloved disciple "got this right"--was to "love one another" (John 13:34; 15:12 & 15; 1 John 3:11 & 23; 4:7, 11, & 12). Without this key component, our interpretation of John 15:10 is missing something important. Do you agree? Don
Feb
12
comment How should 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3 be interpreted?
Thomas, one of the original Twelve, was once a higher critic. He wasn't about to fall for the stories being told by a bunch of hysterical women that Jesus had risen from the dead. "Unless I see in His hands the imprint of the nails, and put my finger into the place of the nails, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe," he said emphatically. Eight days later the resurrected Jesus said to him, "Reach here with your finger, and see My hands; reach here your hand and put it into My side; do not be unbelieving, but believing." Thomas then said to Jesus, "My Lord and my God!" Selah.
Feb
12
comment How should 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3 be interpreted?
"When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail." The hammer, of course, is the favored tool of the higher critics, and the nails in need of pounding (e.g., who REALLY wrote 2 Thessalonians) stem from their unbelief, arrogance, and pride. Throw in a little peer pressure and the fear of losing face if they happen to let it slip they're beginning to feel as though they and their peers are simply re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic, while the people of faith whom they ridicule are living and dying for the Word of God, and what you end up with are a bunch of modern-day Pharisees.
Feb
11
comment What is the accurate meaning of κεφαλὴ (kephalē) in 1 Cor 11:3?
I'd feel more comfortable if in your question you change the word "position" to "role." In the Triune God there is perfect equality, since each person is fully God. At the same time, however, there are differing roles for each person in the Godhead. The Father begets the Son and sends him to become the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. The Holy Spirit indwells every true believer in Jesus Christ and is, in a sense, Christ's surrogate here on earth. He comforts, teaches, fills, guides, convicts of sin, and delights in revealing the Son to God's image bearers here on earth.
Feb
9
comment How should 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3 be interpreted?
As for differing presuppositions, they are not only NOT off topic here, they are without exception at the very foundation of how one does hermeneutics. I'll defend to the death (slight exaggeration) your right to presuppose the biblical text is riddled with inconsistencies, outright errors, antiquated notions, and so on. When you do, however, just say "the majority of liberal scholars posit that __." I'll try to do the same in my postings, saying, e.g., "According the latest findings among the majority of conservative, Evangelical scholars, the apparent discrepancy can be harmonized by ____."
Feb
9
comment How should 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3 be interpreted?
I challenge your use of the term "majority." What I THINK you mean (correct me if I'm wrong) is: "the majority of liberal scholars." If I'm right, then you and I agree that the majority of liberal biblical scholars think 2 Thessalonians wasn't written by Paul. I would venture a guess, however, that the vast majority of CONSERVATIVE biblical scholars would take a contrary view; namely, that when a biblical epistle bears the name of the apostle Paul we can safely assume it was in fact written by Paul.
Feb
8
comment How should 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3 be interpreted?
Who are those scholars with the weighty opinions whom you refer to in the last paragraph of your answer? What makes their opinion weighty and the opinion of theologians and scholars who believe that Paul DID write Thessalonians not so weighty? Isn't it simply a matter of liberal versus conservative? (In other words, it's a matter of differing presuppositions; e.g., liberals tend to discount the reliability of the text, assuming that it cannot possibly be error-free, whereas conservatives see no reason why the text can't be error-free.) religioustolerance.org/chr_ntb3.htm Don
Feb
8
revised What is the proper translation of Genesis 32:28?
a few errata, and I added and/or subtracted a few words here and there