Reputation
3,685
Next privilege 4,000 Rep.
Access 'trusted user' tools
Badges
10 31
Newest
 Necromancer
Impact
~313k people reached

Jul
8
revised Why is the man going to measure Jerusalem in Zechariah 2:2?
added the man
Jul
8
comment The number two in the book of Zechariah
You have been in Zech a while. If you would like to see the whole book unpacked, drop me a note and I'll start working on it. I'd have to do it through e-mail because I don't know what format it would take here.
Jul
8
comment The number two in the book of Zechariah
Just a note.. 7 is the number of completeness in SP. There are six spatial rays of direction, and a seventh in time (you cannot go back in time). 4 is the whole word of God as revealed through prophet, priest, king and judge. These are duals of duals (HH, HE, EH, EE) The duality of time is between time/eternity. As for rhetorical emphasis, tere is a Jewsih rule that says a double letter is not a new root, but an expansion (of some sort) of the root with a single letter. Using this rule it is determined that Cain had a twin sister and Abel had two twin sisters (triplets)
Jul
8
comment The number two in the book of Zechariah
@Kazark Try applying it everywhere you see it. If it only works here it is just free-for-all allegory with a coincidental application. If it works everywhere, it is God's intended meaning.
Jul
8
revised Do any Hermeneutical approaches have a specific meaning for the number 11?
added ya 10+1
Jul
8
revised Do any Hermeneutical approaches have a specific meaning for the number 11?
Added Kabalah
Jul
7
revised What is “the hermeneutical circle”?
added last paragraph; added 151 characters in body
Jul
7
revised What is “the hermeneutical circle”?
added commentary by request
Jul
7
revised Do any Hermeneutical approaches have a specific meaning for the number 11?
sp
Jul
7
answered What is “the hermeneutical circle”?
Jul
7
comment What is “the hermeneutical circle”?
If a hermeneutical principle is not derived from the scriptures, then it is by definition man-made. No wonder we have free-for-all hermeneutics ;-)
Jul
7
comment What is “the hermeneutical circle”?
Hmmm... I seem to remember that a programming language wasn't considered a real language if it's own compiler couldn't be written in it. So why would asking for hermeneutical principles derived from the scriptures be any different?
Jul
7
revised Why was a chapter division placed at the end of Genesis 1, rather than between 2:3 and 2:4?
added 253 characters in body
Jul
7
comment Why was a chapter division placed at the end of Genesis 1, rather than between 2:3 and 2:4?
A few more chapters like this and it might be considered evidence that Langton saw sensus plenior.
Jul
7
answered Why was a chapter division placed at the end of Genesis 1, rather than between 2:3 and 2:4?
Jul
7
comment Does the Gospel of Thomas help in reproducing the hermeneutical methods of the apostles?
Also look how they treat John the B. Mark plainly states that John fulfills prophecy by coming before Jesus. Matthew adds the SP images of the vipers and the axe. Luke includes the birth of John and the sign of his father "no water/word" until John. And John includes the imagery of the firmament of Gen 1. Each a bit more sophisticated that n the previous authors.
Jul
7
comment Does the Gospel of Thomas help in reproducing the hermeneutical methods of the apostles?
I am very skeptical about Q. ;-) Under the assumptions of SP, the disciples were taught how to read the Bible by Jesus, not given omniscient knowledge of it. So each successive book, in the order above, shows a more in depth knowledge of the SP in the OT. Just look at where each author begins the story. Mark with John's preaching, Matthew with Abraham. Luke with Adam. John with Gen 1:1. As they each had more time than the previous author to practice reading as Jesus taught, they make a deeper application of OT scripture.
Jul
6
comment Does the Gospel of Thomas help in reproducing the hermeneutical methods of the apostles?
"But I would want to know if there's any connection between the Gospel of Thomas and the apostles." I would suggest taht many people had access to the apostles, and that GOT was produce FROM their teaching, not the other way around.
Jul
6
comment Does the Gospel of Thomas help in reproducing the hermeneutical methods of the apostles?
Some GOT researchers place an early date on GOT even preceding the gospels. If the gospels are the recorded "dog and pony show" (not meant derogatorily, but based on the repetion of the apostles, preaching the same thing in many places) then a contemporaneous origin is not out of the question. They would be sermon notes on how to read the OT. and the gospels would be the events that Jesus did that fulfilled the OT. This can be shown if the gospels are analyzed as if written in the order Mark, Matt, Luke John, each becoming more sophisticated in the use of SP.
Jul
6
comment Does the Gospel of Thomas help in reproducing the hermeneutical methods of the apostles?
THe GOT has been labelled as Gnostic by those who attempt to understand it literally. Philo is more tunes to Pythogreans, and Greek Philosophy. His use of numerology is completely different. Scholors say that it is likely he did not read Hebrew, without which there can be little tie to the gospels. I have shown that even the Logos is traceable to Gen 1:1 rather than to Philo.