Reputation
3,625
Next privilege 4,000 Rep.
Access 'trusted user' tools
Badges
8 30
Impact
~297k people reached

Feb
13
comment How should we understand the “Cleansing of the Temple”?
@Caleb: same discussion never resolved: Gotcha. It is one of the difficulties in presenting sensus plenior. Everything is so tied together that you have to prove every word, which takes away from the main point. This is my interest in linking. Proving that boiling is tribulation is not the point of the question and discussing it here would be a distraction. So I need to experiment with various links. There is no place for an article or a dictionary of types. I could certainly produce one, .. links in every sensus plenior article offsite would be self promotion... Oct 24 '11 at 23:38
Feb
13
comment How should we understand the “Cleansing of the Temple”?
@Caleb, it is so intertwined that it is self-correcting, but it makes it nearly impossible to explain it.
Feb
13
comment How should we understand the “Cleansing of the Temple”?
@Caleb The problem is bigger than that. The answer already gave the connections. A handful of sheaves is to a field as the parents were to Israel. The five kings is to four kings what the flesh of Jesus is to his spirit. The problem is that now we must explain how we got 5 representing the flesh, which will require that we explain how fish represent the 'every word which comes from the mouth of God' which will require we explain how leaven is 'teaching'.
Feb
13
comment How should we understand the “Cleansing of the Temple”?
That's been the problem from the beginning @Caleb. There has not been an easy way to set a foundation in the methods of the Sensus Plenior hermeneutic. Every answer requires a full explanation of the methods and its justification or it is undiscernible from free-for-allegory (which it is not). Though this forum wishes to be the repository of hermeneutic knowledge, without a place for a systematic presentation of a particular hermeneutic, it can only be a repository of what is commonly known.
Feb
13
comment Where did Abel get the idea to sacrifice sheep?
@David For as long as the first people lived, it would seem unreasonable to assume that Dad and Mom never told their Son what happened in the garden, or what God spoke with them about while he walked with them in the garden.
Feb
13
comment What's the difference between “sensus plenior” and “inspired sensus plenior”?
@JLB One would think that once a hidden meaning is revealed truly, that it would be obvious to those who spoke and thought like Hebrews. Unfortunately, we mostly think like Greeks. The Hebrew hermeneutic was pushed out of the church by Augustine who said the Greek Septuagint was more reliable than the original Hebrew. It is no surprise for it to receive disdain from those who received their hermeneutic from Augustine.
Feb
13
accepted What's the difference between “sensus plenior” and “inspired sensus plenior”?
Feb
4
awarded  Revival
Nov
24
awarded  Popular Question
Oct
15
awarded  Yearling
Jul
13
awarded  Necromancer
Jan
9
revised What belief does Job refer to in Job 19:25?
added 255 characters in body
Jan
9
answered What does Paul mean by allegory in Galatians 4:24?
Jan
9
comment Where does the “slippery slope” of allegorical interpretations start?
I'm not sure how you get Jerusalem on both sides. He makes it clear that there is Jerusalem which now is, and and Jerusalem which is above. These are two different Jerusalems. It is like mixing up Salem Oregon with Salem MA
Jan
9
revised Where does the “slippery slope” of allegorical interpretations start?
added references
Jan
9
comment What's the difference between “sensus plenior” and “inspired sensus plenior”?
@jonI think you added a semantic question. Of course if God intended it, it is inspired. But in the context of Evangelical discussions, it is more than a semantic issue. Ichthydion did a great job with it.
Jan
9
comment Does sensus plenior exist in the New Testament?
I think that is also an example. Thanks.
Jan
9
comment What does it mean for Jesus to fulfill the law?
Heb 11.1 The law having a 'shadow'... the shadow of the law is being referenced, not the positive command. There was no positive command to be a leper, yet he fulfills the law of the leper.
Jan
9
revised What belief does Job refer to in Job 19:25?
added 20 characters in body
Jan
9
comment What belief does Job refer to in Job 19:25?
"The two words which form the name Adam Kadmon allude to its paradoxical nature of being, on the one hand a created being--Adam--while on the other hand a manifestation of primordial Divinity--Kadmon." google adam kadmon site:inner.org changed the link above.