3,489 reputation
628
bio website sensusplenior.net
location
age
visits member for 3 years, 2 months
seen Nov 19 at 2:13

I am in my senior term at the Seminary of the Wilderness. My first ten years were spent as bi-vocational pastor/evangelist in Utah preaching of Christ how I knew best and trying to improve by learning theology from Reformed, Wesleyan, Pentecostal, Baptist and other sources. The second ten years were spent as a BVP/E and discovering that I didn't know what I thought I knew and reading the Bible without outside influence. At the beginning of the third ten I started seeing Christ in the OT, and tried to figure out how and why. I intend in the fourth ten to figure out how to communicate what I learned last term. After that I might be useful for something.

My bias in approaching the Bible is that I believe that it exists in a form today sufficiently intact to be considered infallible. That apparent contradictions are intentional riddles designed to guide us in focusing on different aspects of Christ. That sensus plenior exists in a form which is discernible in a verifiable, and reproducible manner. And that God is a rewarder of those who diligently seek him.


Nov
19
comment Was Adam created as complete man containing both male and female?
@Marg... nope. The story of the rib removed from Adam is a prophecy of Christ. Since Christ was not diminished when the bride was formed through the cross, neither was Adam diminished by the removal of the rib.
Nov
19
comment On what basis is the name “Ephraim” given the etymology of “ash heap”?
Actually, if the Sefira Yetsira is read as a 'formation of language' rather than as an occult document, there is very early evidence for the sub-root as the 'gates' of which it speaks. I have since been collecting such evidence for a dictionary of subroots based on the same proposition.
Nov
18
comment Rod and Staff (Psalm 23)
Sensus plenior is based on the premise that puns and riddles are the genre of prophetic riddle. Literalists shy away from punning.
Nov
2
awarded  Notable Question
Oct
15
awarded  Yearling
Oct
11
comment What does “image” in Genesis 1:26-27 mean?
@Paul Sorry. But if you use your browser to zoom in, this one should be readable.
Sep
30
awarded  Explainer
Sep
24
awarded  Autobiographer
Jul
2
awarded  Curious
Apr
2
comment How does the Noah's Ark narrative relate to the Gilgamesh flood account?
@fdb R.K. Harrison is considered a serious Old Testament Bible Scholar.
Apr
1
comment How do you know an allegory is valid?
@William You are missing the point that the Jewish dietary law does not permit mixing cheese and meat based on this verse.
Mar
20
awarded  Popular Question
Feb
28
awarded  Popular Question
Feb
17
comment Does the Gospel of Thomas help in reproducing the hermeneutical methods of the apostles?
" He certainly doesn't accuse them of knowing more than they communicate in public." He called them serpents (liars). A liar is one who is misrepresenting what he knows to be true. So he did accuse them of knowing something which was true and not sharing it.
Feb
17
revised Does the Gospel of Thomas help in reproducing the hermeneutical methods of the apostles?
The link supports the methods listed by demonstrating them.
Feb
17
comment Meaning of the Parable of the Sower
One interpretation of Ps 78:2 says that parables have a second meaning which speaks of Christ hidden in a riddle. Riddle is a different genre than parable. In the past such interpretations have been frowned upon. Are they now welcome?
Feb
17
comment What does Paul mean by allegory in Galatians 4:24?
There is nothing here to contribute to the improvement of this answer. The question asks for the method of obtaining an allegory, presumably not free-for-all, and the answer steps through the meaning of the words to produce the allegory. It would seem that the word analysis supports the first answer above. No comments is indicative of capriciousness?
Feb
13
comment How should we understand the “Cleansing of the Temple”?
@Caleb If it were not a hostile environment, it might be worth attempting to make something work. I only popped in because someone e-mailed me about an answer and I got distracted. Some of your participants don't realize that all the chat is publicly available and it was easy to see the collusion between hostile parties who attempted to push me away. When it included your mods I decided it wasn't worth it.
Feb
13
comment How should we understand the “Cleansing of the Temple”?
@Caleb: same discussion never resolved: Gotcha. It is one of the difficulties in presenting sensus plenior. Everything is so tied together that you have to prove every word, which takes away from the main point. This is my interest in linking. Proving that boiling is tribulation is not the point of the question and discussing it here would be a distraction. So I need to experiment with various links. There is no place for an article or a dictionary of types. I could certainly produce one, .. links in every sensus plenior article offsite would be self promotion... Oct 24 '11 at 23:38
Feb
13
comment How should we understand the “Cleansing of the Temple”?
@Caleb, it is so intertwined that it is self-correcting, but it makes it nearly impossible to explain it.