| bio | website | soundcloud.com/sarah-noll/… |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 4 months |
| seen | May 11 at 13:23 | |
| stats | profile views | 18 |
I am a singer/songwriter, called to,
"Teach the Word of the Lord; sing it to the nations loud and clear."
I am passionate about God and His Word.
I love inductive Bible study.
I enjoy singing the Psalms.
I am a non-creedal American Baptist with a Messianic and Oneness bend.
I lean strongly toward Aramaic NT primacy.
I am the wife of an American Baptist minister.
I am the mother of two teenage children, one of which we homeschool.
I have a BA in Psychology from Potsdam State college.
I have a BA in Theology from Covington Theological Seminary.
I took a semester of Greek from Gordon Conwell Theological Seminary.
I studied for a year and a half at Northeastern Theological Seminary.
I have a goal to study and master the biblical languages--Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek.
I would like to one day teach in a Bible school or Theological seminary.
For more info see: www.sarahnoll.com
|
Mar 19 |
suggested | suggested edit on What is the baptism of fire? |
|
Mar 19 |
comment |
Upon whom do we call? Reconciling OT & NT Joseph, this is an outstanding answer. Thank you so much. I was so stuck on the name I don't know I would have given thought to the context of the "cornerstone" in the verse! Then, after reading your answer, and pondering some more, I realized that the verse grammatically allows for what you point out, as it says, "the name OF Yhwh," (as opposed to "the NAME Yhwh"). This leaves room for the name of YHWH to be another name (NOT in EXCLUSION of His name still being YHWH, for He says that is his name forever, but rather, IN ADDITION TO his name being YHWH). Thanks again!! |
|
Mar 19 |
accepted | Upon whom do we call? Reconciling OT & NT |
|
Mar 18 |
answered | What language(s) would the Jewish Christians in the various Macedonian cities have spoken? |
|
Mar 15 |
comment |
What does a mustard seed grow into! Thank you Dan. Very cordial of you. |
|
Mar 15 |
accepted | What does a mustard seed grow into! |
|
Mar 15 |
revised |
Why wouldn't the Son of Man know the day and hour of his coming? Suggested edit to re-open the question. |
|
Mar 15 |
comment |
Why wouldn't the Son of Man know the day and hour of his coming? Michael, Welcome. I attempted an edit of your question in effort to re-open it. I did so based on the direction it seemed you were coming from and on how it seems those who answered you understood the question. Don't feel stuck with it though. I'd love to hear from you what you are seeking to find out so you can get your question answered. |
|
Mar 15 |
suggested | suggested edit on Why wouldn't the Son of Man know the day and hour of his coming? |
|
Mar 15 |
comment |
What does a mustard seed grow into! So, the fact is that it is ambiguous? We don't really know what plant is spoken of here, thus we take it as one that was common and the readers would have recognized the contrast between the size of the seed and the resulting plant. Correct? |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
What does a mustard seed grow into! I thought the picture upon which the analogy is based is soundly rooted in reality, whereas, the truths that are conveyed through them are where we must not expect every detail to carry over. Thus I would expect the details of the picture itself to be correct, the small seed grows to a large plant under whose branches bird nest. |
|
Mar 14 |
answered | Does “days” in prophecy equal “years” (Daniel 9 - Seventy Weeks) |
|
Mar 14 |
revised |
What does a mustard seed grow into! added 36 characters in body |
|
Mar 14 |
asked | What does a mustard seed grow into! |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
How do Aramaic primacists respond to Greek primacy arguments? Thank you @Soldarnal. I agree, it was not accomplishing its purpose effectively. Thank you for understanding and acknowledging my intent. I would be fine for it to be removed rather than closed if there is any difference. |
|
Mar 13 |
comment |
What arguments exist that would refute the theory concerning Aramaic primacy of the New Testament? let us continue this discussion in chat |
|
Mar 13 |
comment |
What arguments exist that would refute the theory concerning Aramaic primacy of the New Testament? I will re-read your post. There is much there anyways, that cannot possibly be digested in one reading. Thank you. |
|
Mar 13 |
comment |
What arguments exist that would refute the theory concerning Aramaic primacy of the New Testament? I am left wondering two things. 1) Is possible that SOME of the NT was translated to from Aramaic (I haven't looked at their examples and analyzed them from such a perspective yet to see which books their examples are primarily from). 2) This addresses Hebrew to Greek or Greek primacy. But does any of that have any bearing on whether the Aramaic text was directly delivered with apostolic authority--could not books have been written in two languages simultaneously to accommodate the needs of the nations or the apostles themselves have translated with authority for the nations? |
|
Mar 13 |
comment |
What arguments exist that would refute the theory concerning Aramaic primacy of the New Testament? I agree that his raises a problem for AP in arguing that all of the NT comes from Aramaic. Yet, they give many examples (similar to the ones you shared here that can only be explain by translating from Hebrew to Greek) that can only be explained by by Aramaic to Greek. (Perhaps we can chat on that). |
|
Mar 12 |
comment |
What arguments exist that would refute the theory concerning Aramaic primacy of the New Testament? So what is to say that the original language was not Hebrew, and that it was all translated into Aramaic and Greek for their respective areas, with authority. I guess, what I'm asking is, does this in anyway undermine the historical claim of the Aramaic Church of the East that they recieved their Scripture from the Apostles and have faithfully copied it since then to the present. Does it likewise have to be an either Greek or Aramaic, or can it be both? |

