Tag Info

Hot answers tagged

5

While reading links to add to this question, I ran across Gesenius’ explanation (§129 c.), which seems to be too much of an answer to incorporate into the question. I therefore offer it as an answer, although I have a sense that it’s up for disputing, and I’d love to see other answers incorporating more recent scholarship. Gesenius labels this lamed ...


4

It appears that the LXX translator (rather than the NETS translator) "saw" a different text here. Typically זד gets translated (as you would expect), with something reflecting "insolent" or nasty:1 παράνομος : Ps 86[85]:14; 119[118]:85 ὑπερήφανος : Ps 119[118]:21, 51, 69, 78, 122 θρασύς : Prov 21:24 ἄνομος : Isa 13:11 On three occasions, however, there ...


1

There seems to be no consensus as to just when the superscripts were added to the psalms, other than that they were probably not all added at the same time, and that they were not always fixed but evolved, not being considered sacred in the way the psalm texts were. I looked up Mark S. Smith's paper, 'Taking Inspiration:Authorship, Revelation, and the Book ...


1

The answer is no, because there is no real evidence that King David wrote any of the psalms attributed to him. James Luther Mays says in Psalms, page 9, that the personal identities of the authors of the Psalms are unknown. He says the quest for the origin of individual psalms leads to occasions in Israel's public exercise of religion, not to their authors. ...



Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible