Hot answers tagged hermeneutical-approaches
17
Professor Bart D. Ehrman's Curriculum Vitae reveals an academic with impeccable credentials. Perhaps the most important line is:
Ph.D. Princeton Theological Seminary (magna cum laude), 1985
His doctoral adviser was none other than Bruce Metzger, who wrote the book on textual criticism of the New Testament. Ehrman doesn't simply ride on the coattails ...
9
I don't think it's as simple as knowing when to take a verse literally or symbolically. I will attempt to propose a hermeneutical approach to the translation of the book of Revelation. I am going to approach the text from a Christian perspective (as this was the intended audience). I would not call these 'rules,' but rather 'principles' of interpretation ...
9
Hillel's seven were later expanded by Rabbi Yishmael ben Elisha into thirteen, dropping one. I'll be drawing this list from the list on Wikipedia. I'll be drawing some examples from this answer on Mi Yodeya about R. Yishmael's list that in turn quotes from the Artscroll prayer book.1
Kal v'chomer: if a lenient case has a stringency, then surely a ...
8
Several techniques that people use to establish literary dependence include:
Identical passages of several words or more
Unusual or unexpected words matching (especially usages that are idiosyncratic to one of the authors)
Overal structure matching
Matches in narrative or parenthetical material (this precludes the possibility that both are just quoting the ...
7
Always remember that to effectively use the Quadriga, you must start with the literal (i.e. grammatical-historical methodology) first. If one cannot apply a literal method then you are automatically forced to use a spiritual (allegorical) methodology. The allegorical method is then further divided into topological and anagogical where a text not only gives a ...
7
I think examples of types of interpretation answer the question best.
Literary Interpretation – 'How does this text fit within the text before and after?' 'What kind of language is used, literal, symbolic? This is used for all literature, spiritual or not.
Historical Interpretation – 'What did this mean to those people when they wrote it, and ...
7
Most of the answers so far are getting all hung up over very specific examples of morphological analysis. It is by far better to start with the basic notion of "morphological analysis", then look at how each of these instances already mentioned meet the goals of morphological analysis.
Morphological analysis means exactly what the etymology suggests: it is ...
7
For a detailed explanation on Christo-centric preaching (and thereby indirectly the hermeutic), I highly, highly recommend Keller + Clowney's 16-part seminar they held on "Preaching Christ to a Postmodern world", available for free(!) on iTunes U. Here is the link: https://itunes.apple.com/us/itunes-u/preaching-christ-in-postmodern/id378879885
I'd agree ...
6
My answer might not be in line with the question if you only mean technical methods. However there is the obvious notion of prayer and reliance upon the Holy Spirit to open our eyes to what He has written to us. After all if the Spirit is the true author and men only the medium, we have more advantage in understanding the words by the Spirit than we would if ...
6
Disclosure: This represents an Eastern Christian perspective (yet its applicability is not confined solely to Eastern Christians).
I've met many very intellectually gifted Protestants who share their hermeneutical approach to scripture and yet come up with widely varying positions on the interpretation of various passages. Hence 23,000+ Protestant ...
6
I don't see the problem. God as described in the bible is all-powerful and beyond human comprehension (see, for example, Job). Anything we can say about God is inherently limited because we are limited beings. (This is, most famously, the position of Maimonides, aka Rabbi Moses ben Maimon, writing in the 12th century CE.) Even if you hold that the bible ...
6
The "less messianic" reading is rather prosaic - it's just a reference to a bridegroom.
The cultural context is a wedding song. In the Israelite and later Jewish tradition, the guests at a wedding celebration are obligated to praise the beauty of the bride to the groom and his family, and conversely to the bride and her family, and all this, even when the ...
5
From a modern hermeneutics perspective:
First, the distinction needs to be made as to whether or not you're asking when or how. When indicates a circumstantial acknowledgement of the purview of Scripture on one's life whereas how indicates constant purview of Scripture.
There are also three words that seem to be used interchangeably but that are actually ...
5
Good question. These terms are not mutually exclusive and share elements, making it hard to sometimes understand the difference.
Allegory is a type of extended metaphor used in literature to convey a message or belief. A great Christian example of allegory is Aslan the lion from C.S. Lewis’ Chronicles of Narnia. He symbolizes Christ throughout the series ...
5
After reading a book called ‘the sensus plenior’ by Raymond E Brown, I was disappointed to find that the word sensus plenior is nothing new, contrary to the hype associated with words. The book simply just tries to defend the obvious fact that there is meaning in scripture that goes beyond the understanding of the author. Why anyone would doubt that there is ...
5
I was taught in seminary 2 foundational rules to remember before all others.
Pay attention to the text.
Pay attention to the context.
While you won't see these rules stated verbatim in Scripture, you will certainly see them applied. Notice throughout the NT how the phrase, "It is written" and similar phrases appear. These are always used with quotes of ...
5
He is not respected by most conservatives when he slips into theology. Textual criticism, he is very good and knows what he is doing. However, I find him sloppy in his work if it pushes his agenda. What's worse is that he knows how to do the work, but since his faith lapsed, he misapplies and misquotes the rules of determining historicity. For example, ...
5
Abstract
Using the historical-grammatical method, whether a text should be taken allegorically depends on the genre of the text. Usually, the author provides sufficient clues to the genre for us to accurately determine if a text is to be taken as something more than the surface meaning.
Genre
One of the challenges of interpreting the Bible is that it ...
5
The New Hermeneutic is an approach that focuses on how current audiences interact with the biblical text. Ernst Fuchs and Gerhard Ebeling are considered to be the initiators of this method.
The New Hermeneutic is based on the presupposition of the timelessness of the text and claims that this timelessness necessarily means that it holds new meaning for ...
5
Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch dedicated many essays to this subject. They may be found in English translation in his Collected Writings, Volume III; ISBN:0-87306-786-X.
The primary tools Rabbi Hirsch uses in his analysis are the following ground rules, which he develops in the introductory chapter (slightly abridged for convenience):
The symbolic ...
4
Jews and Christians both consider the tanakh to be important scripture (usually seen as of divine origin, though individual denominations/movements may vary). They differ in how they derive meaning from that text, however. In this answer I'm going to describe some approaches used by each group, but it's important to note that there isn't much that's ...
4
If allegorical interpretation is a slippery slope, it's of the semantic variety. When you start reading things allegorically, it's certainly possible to stop when the interpretations don't make sense anymore. But it's difficult to draw a clear line between a passage that is intended to be taken strictly literally and one that is not. Further, the ...
4
Hermeneutics: Is the study and the right application of scriptures make man knowledgeable, acceptable, truthful, and serviceable.
Purpose of Hermeneutics
To avoid Biblical controversies.
To correct Biblical heresies (if any)
To establish the right knowledge to the hearer (Hos. 4:6)
To equip the hearers with the right knowledge about the scriptures
To ...
4
Whether sensus plenior (either inspired or not) exists is largely a question that depends on the particular doctrine an interpretation is evaluated in. Certainly the early Christian writers believed that the Hebrew Scriptures they inherited contained important links with the man they had come to revere as the Messiah. There's no particular reason why they ...
4
Using Google, I find that "inspired sensus plenior" is most closely associated with Robert L. Thomas out of The Master's Seminary. More accurately, he coined the term "inspired sensus plenior applications (ISPA)" to describe a subset of the hermeneutical principles used by New Testament authors:
When interpreting the OT and NT, each in light of the ...
4
Dispensationalism is a framework, but the framework itself is only the result of a few basic assumptions. These basic assumptions are wrong, which is why the framework is so complicated.
1 The Jew-Gentile division was permanent, thus:
2 The current Christian priesthood is temporary, thus:
3 The current priesthood must be removed and the Aaronic one ...
4
This is a tricky question, because different people define these terms in different ways. But in essence:
Allegory is an extended metaphor; this is a meaning intended in the original text
Typology is a foreshadowing of later events; this is a secondary meaning that often can only be seen after the fact
There is some overlap between the two terms, but
...
4
The hermeneutical circle defines intellectual integrity. It is akin to the engineering design cycle. Each iteration produces new information, which is then acted upon in the next.
James addresses it:
Jas 1:23 For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is
like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass: 24 For he
beholdeth ...
4
A simple way to explain the RMAC (Robinson's Morphological Analysis Codes) is that words in the Greek language changed ('morph'-ed) their form depending on how they were being used (and therefore to be understood) in a given context. We do this same thing with many of our own words: give, given, giver, gave; have, has, hasn't, had; go, going, gone, went, ...
4
There's two important things about interpreting the bible:
You must be consistent, and not use a different method for different books of the Bible. (You can't interpret an entire book using one hermeneutic, and another book using an entirely different one. You must find a hermeneutic that you can apply consistently)
Let the Bible interpret the Bible. ...
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
