New answers tagged

0

Peter Carnley says in The Structure of Resurrection Belief that he believes the four accounts do originate in a single story, after redaction by the four evangelists: There is no suggestion that the tomb was discovered by different witnesses on four different occasions, so it is in fact impossible to argue that the discrepancies were introduced by ...


0

The scriptural hope has always been to live with God in the promised land in the middle east on the dry land above the abyss and below the sky ceiling: Gen 13:15 because I'm going to give you and your descendants all of the land that you see—forever! The promise was not going to be realized by all of the Jews but was conditioned on obedience: ...


1

I will focus on the difference between the account in John's Gospel and that in the Synoptics. I will start with two assumptions: John had the text of the Synoptics available before him when composing his Gospel, so that when he deviated from the Synoptics' account he did it on purpose and for a purpose, which was providing not just factual accuracy (which ...


1

The simplistic answer would be to say that each evangelist chose to include historical details that he thought to be relevant, while omitting other details that he knew to be true but felt it not necessary to report. This overlooks the fact that Matthew and Luke are regarded by almost all New Testament scholars to have been substantially based on Mark's ...


1

I will address only the first two issues in the question, regarding dates. The bottom line of my answer is that John is factually accurate and that he intentionally deviated from the Synoptics for the purpose of noting important theological meaning, not for the sake of dating accuracy itself. There are two possible chronologies, which I will call C14 and ...



Top 50 recent answers are included