Tag Info

New answers tagged

0

I'm going to go out on a limb here, because for most readers this is unfamiliar territory. Archaelogists and scholars have long realised that the ancient Israelites were polytheistic - not just occasionally and in rebellion, but systemically. Mark S. Smith says in The Early History of God(p52-53) that a tenth-century cultic stand from the site of Taanach in ...


0

Why does he say he saw God when he only saw an angel? Because although the reader knows it is only an angel, he didn't. In fact, the text actually doesn't say it was an angel. It is called a "man" throughout. Its just traditional interpretation to view it as an angel. It comes from the fact that John says (in John 1) that no man has ever seen God. ...


0

Israel means Inheritance. The sons of God in heaven are the Elohom, are called 'Principles" they who are responsible to collect the inheritance from Earth(Spiritual Israel in the finalty) ) redeemed through Christ. To this the one who wrestled with the Patriarch Jacob was none else than Michael the Archangel who introduced the name "Israel"


0

Unfortunately, the confusion arises only as a result of the pre-existing theological position in the source material. The article you linked to is trying to prove that the archangel Michael is Jesus, which is why it introduces this translation error, for it to then be able to appeal to it as an argument to support its claim. As many have already pointed ...


2

There are three common views on the identity of the 'sons of God' marrying the 'daughters of men' in Genesis 6.1-4: Descendants of Seth married descendants of Cain Nobles married commoners Angels married human women 1. Descendants of Seth married descendants of Cain This view was popularized by Augustine (City of God, chapter 23), and the argument ...


4

A Contrary Argument: Seeing the Reference as to Good Angels Jack Douglas laid out some good points to argue for 1 Pet 2:11 to be evil angels. However, I do find some holes and things left unconsidered that for me seem to point to a contrary conclusion. I will address the three points and the conclusion he makes to frame my counter argument. Regarding Point ...


4

The other angels in 2 Peter are evil1 Angels are only mentioned twice in 2 Peter. The other mention is near the start of the same logical section in verse 4: 4For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell and committed them to chains of gloomy darkness to be kept until the judgment; ESV If these angels are good angels, why ...


3

The first thing we need to understand is that the Hebrew word מַלְאָךְ (mal'akh) literally means "messenger." It can refer to human messengers (Hag. 1:13) as well as spiritual messengers (Gen. 22:11; the latter is what we commonly refer to as "angels"). A related noun מַלְאָכוּת (mal'akhut) derived from the same triliteral root מל"ך means "message" (Hag. ...


-3

Jesus walked with Abraham Jesus was in Jacobs heart Jesus is the wrestler We know God as Jesus mostly, the son of God, word of God, core of God, essence of God. Character of God in flesh and blood life form. Son of man and son of God. God or Yeah is spirit of life generating life from eternity to eternity. Yeahwhoo is God the father who is spirit of ...



Top 50 recent answers are included