Tell me more ×
Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I don't have my Bible with me at the moment, so I can't quote, but the interactions between Tamar and Judah indicate, and perhaps provide a categorical example of, the mode of intersexual interaction in Genesis. Prevalent therein is the underhanded method by which many female figures in Genesis exert influence, and encapsulates rather nicely the ever-present disparity between the sexes.

Well, that's the position I'm attempting to argue, but I was curious as to what you all thought. There are plenty of other male-female relationships in Genesis, almost all of which are not as perverse, per se, as that of Tamar and Judah. However, I feel that the patterns put forth by the story are at least echoed in all others of similar ilk within Genesis.

Here's a bit of evidence to further concretize my argument.

Following the death of Er and Onan for their various sins, Judah commands Tamar to remain single:

‘Remain a widow in your father’s house..." (NSRV Gen. 38:11)

I feel that this dictation of Tamar's marital/sexual status by Judah echoes the "endangerment of the matriarch" stories earlier, where Abraham supplants Sarah's sexual/marital legitimacy, as does Jacob with Rachel. What do you think?

Secondly, and, in my opinion, consequently, Tamar dupes Judah into sleeping with her to reaffirm this legitimacy and conceive the child she felt she deserved from Shelah. This echoes, in my eyes, the underhanded tactics employed by Rebekah to ensure Jacob's receipt of Isaac's blessing and the authority to become patriarch. Again, how do you feel about this reasoning?

I hope that narrows my scope a bit.

share|improve this question
4  
Welcome to Biblical Hermeneutics! You can get copies of the Bible online. There's even a handy userscript that Caleb modified to make it easy to post quotes here. I think it would really help your question to include the relevant passage you are asking about. Otherwise, it's just a bit too broad for you to expect a really great answer. – Jon Ericson Feb 2 '12 at 19:26
Could you please narrow it down to a specific textual question? – Lance Roberts Feb 2 '12 at 19:48
1  
To my eye the Tamar/Judah story is very different from the others in Genesis. Could you clarify the similarities you're seeing? – Monica Cellio Feb 2 '12 at 20:48
edited to include specifics. – voxanimus Feb 3 '12 at 0:57
@Monica: I can't make heads or tails of this question and voxanimus doesn't seem to be around any more to help us. Do you think there is a real question here or should we vote to close it? – Jon Ericson Feb 13 '12 at 19:56
show 2 more comments

closed as not a real question by Jon Ericson Mar 29 at 15:19

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.

1 Answer

There is a definitely a cycle of feminine trickery stories that most commentators note:

  1. Lot's daughters
  2. Rebekah's advice to Jacob regarding Isaac's blessing
  3. Rachel's theft of her father's terafim
  4. Tamar's manipulation of Judah
  5. The midwives Shifra and Puah
  6. Yocheved's hiding Moses in the reed ark on the river
  7. Miriam tricking Pharoah's daughter regarding a nursemaid for Moses

In each case, the outcome of the narrative of the People is critically influenced by the resourceful tactics that the women employ. That in itself is a message. Looking at these stories on balance, they appear to be about something bigger than individual relationships, matriarchal rights or gender roles. The women always seem to be looking far into the future while the men are too preoccupied with controlling the present to comprehend the consequences of their actions (like selling Joseph to the Ishmaelites).

share|improve this answer
I'd never thought of the distinction between focusing on the future compared to focusing on the immediate. You could add in the stories of Leah and Rachel trying to win Jacob's favor by having sons in Genesis 30 (and particularly the story of he mandrakes in verses 14-18). – Jon Ericson Apr 9 '12 at 15:42

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.