Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In chapter 3 of book of Daniel we find the story of the three young men that are thrown in fire because they refused to worship the image of gold that Nebuchadnezzar made.

King Nebuchadnezzar made an image of gold, sixty cubits high and six cubits wide, and set it up on the plain of Dura in the province of Babylon. (Daniel 3:1)

The three Jews refused to worship the image of gold:

They said to King Nebuchadnezzar, “May the king live forever!

Your Majesty has issued a decree that everyone who hears the sound of the horn, flute, zither, lyre, harp, pipe and all kinds of music must fall down and worship the image of gold,

and that whoever does not fall down and worship will be thrown into a blazing furnace.

But there are some Jews whom you have set over the affairs of the province of Babylon — Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego — who pay no attention to you, Your Majesty. They neither serve your gods nor worship the image of gold you have set up.” (Daniel 3:9-12)

Where was Daniel in these moments?

share|improve this question
1  
In the previous chapter, it says Daniel was promoted to a high office in the kingdom. It is possible he was on an official errand when Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego were condemned to the furnace. –  Gryphoenix May 30 '14 at 14:23
    
It is entirely possible that Daniel was reluctantly one of the people to bow down to the image set up by Nebuchadnezzar. There's no biblical basis to show that he was gone or that he was around so neither assumption can be thrown out. –  LCIII May 30 '14 at 16:25
    
Great A+++ Question! however, I don't think this question will be able to be answered by anything other than speculation. –  mastermissions.com Sep 9 '14 at 20:44

1 Answer 1

Leonard J Greenspoon says in ‘Between Alexandria and Antioch: Jews and Judaism in the Hellenistic Period’, published in The Oxford History of the Biblical World page 322, that, at least in its finished form, the Book of Daniel was a Jewish novel. Its authors or compilers were not intent on relating actual events of the past, nor did they expect their audience to understand the book as historical. Although we may find an answer within the text, we should not regard that as historically correct, nor should we expect corroboration from any independent source.

In Daniel chapter 3, Nebuchadnezzar demanded that everyone in the kingdom worship a great idol that was set up on the plain, whenever they heard the music. But he was told that Daniel’s friends, Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-nego, refused to worship the idol or pay homage to the gods. They were brought before him and told that unless they worship as required, they would be thrown in a fiery furnace. The boys were bound and taken to the furnace, but it was so exceedingly hot that it killed the men who held them. The king saw the three, alive and in the company of an angel, in the midst of the fire, without even a hair singed or their clothes burnt. He then ordered that anyone who spoke against the God of Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-nego be cut to pieces.

Notice that the text brings to our attention that the fire "was so exceedingly hot that it killed the men who held them," making it all the more miraculous that the young men survived unscathed. Then we are told that Nebuchadnezzar honoured the God of Daniel and his friends, a point made even more forcefully in chapter 4 and again, with a different king, in chapter 6. Greenspoon says (ibid, page 341) that the Hebrew form of Daniel neatly divides into two parts, with chapters 1 to 6 consisting of a collection of tales, in which Daniel and his companions demonstrate the superiority of their God and those who obediently follow him over the worshippers of false, empty and powerless deities.

The Book of Daniel does not tell us where Daniel was at the time the three young men were cast into the furnace, so that information is unavailable to us. However, it could be noted that if Daniel had been included in this scene, and so cast in the fire, then the very similar drama of his being cast into the lion's den would be lessened. For literary reasons, he needed to be elsewhere.

share|improve this answer

protected by Dan May 30 '14 at 16:37

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.