Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Matthew 23:9 (ESV)

But you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all brothers. And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven. Neither be called instructors, for you have one instructor, the Christ.

What does Jesus mean by "father?"

Assuming he doesn't mean we should stop calling our dads "father," what is he ruling out?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Jesus was simply exposing the inappropriateness of the behavior of the scribes and Pharisees who desired to be honored publicly. Perhaps their top three favored forms of being addressed in public in those days were:

1) Rabbi

2) Father

3) Leader

In Jesus' estimation and economy no one but God is as worthy of any of those appellations. That's not to say we must not call anyone "teacher," "father," or "leader." It is to say we as Christ's followers should not play into the hands of those people who want only to be noticed, recognized, and the center of attention as they perform what they consider to be God's work, whether teaching, mentoring, or leading.

If a true brother or sister in Christ is a teacher, mentor (father or mother), or leader, he or she should go about his or her business in teaching in the same way any other brother or sister in Christ might go about his or her business in helping, giving, exhorting, showing mercy, prophesying, pastoring, administering, leading, mentoring, or whatever the spiritual gift.

The greatest teachers, mentors, and leaders will not draw attention to themselves but will be satisfied being humble servants in the employ of the King of kings. From their point of view, if God chooses to exalt them at some point in their ministry, fine; if not, then that's fine, too. After all, we all are at best, servants of the King (see 1 Corinthians 3:5; 4:1).

We may be rewarded for faithfulness in this life, but then again we may not be. We will, however, be rewarded in heaven. From my perspective, my Lord's words

"Well done, good and faithful servant"

will be a sufficient reward for me! (See Matthew 25:21 and 23.) As for the scribes and Pharisees Jesus criticized, their reward began and ended in this life, with no possibility of a future reward. In this regard, what did Jesus say about their reward for public almsgiving, prayer, and fasting as recorded in His Sermon on the Mount?

"'Beware of practicing your righteousness before men to be noticed by them; otherwise you have no reward with your Father who is in heaven . . . Truly I say to you, they [viz. the hypocrites who parade their righteousness] have their reward in full'" (Matthew 6:2, 5, and 16).

In conclusion, there is nothing wrong, I feel, in addressing a teacher, a mentor, or a leader in a respectful way, as long as said person is not on an "ego trip" as were the scribes and Pharisees Jesus described in Matthew 23. For a man to be called "my spiritual father or mother," his or her motive in wanting to be addressed as such must not be rooted in pride and the desire for attention and notoriety.

In the U.S., for example, we might address someone as "Doctor" (Ph.D or M.D.), "Boss" (or "Sir" or "Ma'am"), or "Pastor" (or "Reverend" or "Bishop" or even "Father," within the Roman Catholic Church) and not thereby incur Jesus' wrath. Again, if the said person considers himself or herself a servant-leader, teacher, or mentor, and is humble in that role (or "gifting"), an honorific title is perfectly OK. What does the Scripture say?

"Render to all what is due them: tax to whom tax is due; custom to whom custom ; fear to whom fear ; honor to whom honor" (Romans 13:7 NAS, my emphasis).

Does it go without saying that for a child to call his dad "Father" is also perfectly acceptable to God? Again, our earthly dads and moms are those to whom honor is due!

share|improve this answer
    
While I agree with your answer Don, it might be spruced up with a source describing how 'father' was used in the context Jesus was talking about. I also don't gather from your answer any negative connotation of a child addressing his "father" ; >) –  user2479 Apr 10 at 4:23
    
@user2479: Point taken. I've edited my post accordingly. See my last two paragraphs. Thanks. Don –  rhetorician Apr 10 at 18:43
    
Much better-thank you. –  user2479 Apr 10 at 19:03

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.