Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Genesis 7:5-12

5 And Noah did according to all that the LORD commanded him.6 Noah was six hundred years old when the floodwaters were on the earth. 7 So Noah, with his sons, his wife, and his sons' wives, went into the ark because of the waters of the flood.8 Of clean animals, of animals that are unclean, of birds, and of everything that creeps on the earth,9 two by two they went into the ark to Noah, male and female, as God had commanded Noah.10 And it came to pass after seven days that the waters of the flood were on the earth.11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep were broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.12 And the rain was on the earth forty days and forty nights.

This is in relation to the question How can the 3 Questions be resolved with the math still correct?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

I looked at your chronology charts from the other question to understand the context of your question here. There is certainly no linguistic or exegetical reason that v.6 could not be a "summary" statement about the age of Noah during the flood. Verse 6 simply states a fact:

Noah was six hundred years old when the floodwaters were on the earth.

He may have been 600 for most of that year, but to be a true statement, he only needed to be 600 but one day of that time in which the floodwaters were on the earth. Such a summary would technically be referring to something chronologically after the start of the flood when he was 599 years old "in the six hundredth year" of his life.

Further evidence that v.6 may be summary (chronologically after v.11) is that v.5 is also such a summary. God commanded Noah about loading the ark in vv.1-3, noting that in v.4 that in "seven days" the rain would come. Verse 5 then summarizes that Noah did this command, but the actual narrative of doing that command comes in vv.7-9 (and again in vv.13-16). So v.5 summarizes vv.7-9 and 13-16, and there is no reason to not see v.6 summarizing the entire flood event from its beginning in v.10-11 (after the seven days), up to such a time as the flood waters were abated.

To me, there seems to be good reason to see vv.5-6 as both being summarizations of Noah obeying God's command to enter the ark in light of the coming flood, and that such a flood did occur (as God promised) during the time Noah became 600 years old--which is the only birthday he passed while on the ark for just over a year, since it was while he was 600, in his 601st year that he exited (Gen 8:13-19). This singular birthday date may be why the 600 is mentioned in the summary.

share|improve this answer
1  
Welcome to BH-SE! You make some helpful observations. Thank you. Perhaps we shall see more from you (on breaks between web designing and your PhD studies of course!) –  Sarah Mar 20 at 18:22
1  
The main thing holding me back from participation has been some of the issues addressed in this meta posting of mine. I cannot say that I have fully come to a feeling of comfort about participation, but I guess I felt compelled to post here. So who knows... Thanks for the welcome. –  ScottS Mar 20 at 18:31
    
Glad to have ya, @ScottS –  Daи Mar 21 at 20:59

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.