Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Matthew 10:34 New International Version (NIV)

34 “Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.

How do we understand Jesus use of the word Sword in this verse?

share|improve this question
2  
"Sword" is obviously a contrast to "peace" in the same verse. While "peace" indicates harmony/tranquility/unity, "sword", the opposite, refers to war/strife/division. Is this what you're asking, or are you asking how we see in practice that Jesus' doctrine divides people against each other? –  Niobius Nov 30 '13 at 17:01
    
Yes your right, but are these not one and the same thing, I mean the sword representing the opposite of peace and that Jesus's doctrine divides people! yes I see something more..is there a possible correlation here to where we read that the word of God is like a two edged sword dividing between bone and marrow? –  John Unsworth Dec 1 '13 at 12:17
    
Check out 2 Cor 10:3-6, where Paul says his weapons are not of the flesh. Note that ideas can do battle, and ideas can take on lives of their own. Richard Dawkins was wise to coin the word meme, despite his general philosophical naïveté. :-) –  Luke Breuer Dec 4 '13 at 0:05

2 Answers 2

up vote 9 down vote accepted

In Matt. 10:34, it is written,

Do not think that I came to send peace on the earth. I did not come to send peace, but rather, a sword!

μὴ νομίσητε ὅτι ἦλθον βαλεῖν εἰρήνην ἐπὶ τὴν γῆν οὐκ ἦλθον βαλεῖν εἰρήνην ἀλλὰ μάχαιραν

The "sword" (Greek μάχαιρα) represents "division" (Greek διαμερισμός), and this is evident when we examine the Synoptic parallel in Luke 12:51, in which it is written,

Do you suppose that I came to give peace on earth? No, I tell you! But rather, division!

δοκεῖτε ὅτι εἰρήνην παρεγενόμην δοῦναι ἐν τῇ γῇ οὐχί λέγω ὑμῖν ἀλλ᾽ ἢ διαμερισμόν

What does this division involve?

If we read the next verses following either verse, Jesus explains that it involves division of families.

In Matt. 10:35-36, it is written,

For I came to sever a man from his father, and the daughter from her mother, and the daughter-in-law from her mother-in-law. And a man's enemies shall be of his house.

In Luke 12:52-53, it is written,

For from now on, there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother-in-law against her daughter-in-law, and the daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.

This may not be well understood in America, in which the religious majority is Christianity (however, it does happen on occasion). However, in the Middle East, particularly Judea, which is the setting of the Gospel, the religious majority was Judaism. Not too long after Christianity was born, the Pharisees and the Sanhedrin became hostile to any Jews who converted to Christianity. Those Jews who confessed Christ were excommunicated from the people of Israel and placed under cherem. John Gill describes this in vast detail. Naturally, this would affect family relationships.

share|improve this answer
    
I entirely agree with your answer as expressed by your definition of 'sword'. The deeper question, however, is did Jesus 'sanction' strife and debates amonst believers? and did this 'sword' mean actively using 'The Word' to point out something objectionable or fault finding? This to me spells out the difficulty in interpretting this passage: are we to go on a Scriptural 'rampage' with our 'swords', or do we accept the fact that the truth itself will reveal divisions-even within our hearts? –  user2479 Dec 2 '13 at 1:27
    
@user2479 your deeper question is a theological question, not a textual question. It would be better asked on C.SE. Remember that here we stop short of applying the text, and we are not a Christian (or any other religious) site. –  Daи Dec 3 '13 at 18:31
    
@user2479 I never had the impression that Jesus sanctions 'strife and debate'. His Kingdom is one of peace and unity and every believer experiences the body as he experiences the head in Christ. –  John Unsworth Dec 4 '13 at 18:21

He meant these swords:

Luke 22:38 The disciples said, "See, Lord, here are two swords." "That's enough!" he replied.

These two swords are two prophets of the Lord:

Rev 11:3 And I will appoint my two witnesses, and they will prophesy for 1,260 days, clothed in sackcloth.”

These two swords will cause a lot of pain to the body of Christ:

Rev 11:10 The inhabitants of the earth will gloat over them and will celebrate by sending each other gifts, because these two prophets had tormented those who live on the earth.

These two swords are then united into ONE to become Word:

Heb 4:12 For the word of God is alive and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart.

share|improve this answer

We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.

2  
Welcome to Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange! Be sure to take our site tour to learn more about us. We're a little different from other sites. This doesn't show its work, which is a requirement on this site. Don't just tell us what you know, tell us how you know it. Please connect the dots between these texts more. –  Daи Jun 29 at 17:56
    
@Daи, if you don't see connection between the dots that I pointed out, how is it my problem? Other people might find this information useful. As to your question of "how I know it", I'll answer: all information in this world comes from two springs - lower springs and higher springs. It is for you to decide from which spring I've gotten the above information. –  Habakook Jun 30 at 6:16
1  
be sure to read what we're looking for in answers and about what makes us different from other sites that study the Bible. Our community has different standards for participation than you may be used to. –  Daи Jun 30 at 15:09
1  
Habakook you are off on the wrong foot here. Please slow down a second and actually read some of the posts @Daи linked you to. This isn't a place to answer Bible questions, it's a place specifically to study hermeneutics and the process of HOW interpretations are arrived at. As such this answer does not currently meet those expectations. Worse, the tone of your comment suggests you aren't interested in figuring out what this site is about. It is incumbent on you as an answerer to show why you think these pieces go together, not on readers to divine whether your source is "higher" or "lower". –  Caleb Jun 30 at 15:29
    
Ok, gents, if you don't like what you've read, you can link this answer as a bad answer example for other users. You can also downvote my answer all the way to the bottom if you don't like the trail of thought. But I want to remind you that from your links (and I quote): "Having several diverse answers to each question should be something we prize." –  Habakook Jun 30 at 16:37

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.