Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I noticed that in the 2011 NIV, Job 28 is marked off as an interlude as does not appear in quotation marks; whereas in the 1984 NIV, the text appears in quotation marks and is considered a part of Job's final speech. I can see how 29:1 might recommend the 2011 approach. Should this passage about wisdom be considered an interlude by the narrator? If so, why might the narrator choose to place it there?

share|improve this question
I know you know this, but for the sake of people reading this later: quotation marks represent an interpretation on the part of the translator. Neither ancient Hebrew nor Greek had symbols for demarking a passage as a quotation. So the question is about how the passage in question ought to be rendered using modern punctuation. (It's a great question that I don't know how to answer myself. +1) –  Jon Ericson Nov 22 '11 at 21:13

1 Answer 1

If you read the text straight through without the division into chapters, chapter 28 seems to flow naturally from the end of 27 -- the chapter division almost seems to be in the middle of a thought. I don't know why the chapters were divided the way they were, but they are not in the original text. Chapters 29-31 read clearly as one discourse. So I don't see clear textual support for it not being part of his discourse, though I can't prove it's not an authorial interruption.

One might argue that chapter 29 beginning with "Job continued..." means there must have been an interruption. I don't have an answer for that beyond noting that "X said... and X said" constructs appear elsewhere too. It's not common but it does happen.

Please note: This answer was written for a neutral, academic audience and is not intended to be interpreted in the context of a religious belief or doctrine.

share|improve this answer
Good point about the chapter divisions. Another way to look at the start of 29 is that it's a really long speech. After a while, the reader (and any listeners) would start to lose track of who is speaking and so a reminder could be in order when the topic changes. –  Jon Ericson Nov 23 '11 at 0:02
@JonEricson, right -- every now and then an "X said" helps you keep track. That doesn't mean it needs to occur in each chapter, as demonstrated by 29-31. (We agree; I'm just adding to what you said.) –  Gone Quiet Nov 23 '11 at 1:02
@JonEricson - I was just looking at this again, and one thing I noticed is that these "And Job continued" lines appear after some part of the discourse where it is not obvious that Job is speaking anymore. 26:1-4 it's obvious Job is speaking to his friends. Verses 5-14 then could be a monologue. 27:1 "Job continued", 27:2-12 dialogue, 27:13-28:28 monologue, 29:1, "Job continued". The rest of the way it's all obvious Job is speaking until 31:40: "The words of Job are ended." Still don't know what to make of it. –  Soldarnal Dec 15 '11 at 21:31

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.