Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Do Christian or Muslim theologians use the same rules as Rabbinate teachers do, when they interpret their respective holy scriptures?

I'm particularly interested in the '13-methods to infer from holy scriptures'.

share|improve this question
    
Partial duplicate: How do Jewish scholars differ from Christian scholars in their approach to the Tanakh? (Christian and Jewish). –  Gone Quiet Jun 9 '13 at 3:31
    
Hi yarony and welcome to Biblical Hermeneutics. I refocused the question to be about the modern usage of Rabbi Ishmael's rules. Please consider an making an edit if you feel I've misrepresented your question somehow. –  Jon Ericson Jun 10 '13 at 6:34

1 Answer 1

At the seminary I graduated from, we were taught the rules in Dr. Hernanado's Hermeneutics class as part of the history of interpretation. In Dr. Nunnally's Jewish backgrounds to the NT class, we were drilled in them again. They both showed us places in the New Testament where the writers used the rules in their own interpretation. However, we were not expected to use them on our own. We could do so but were not required.

Christian hermeneutics use similar rules. For example, "from the minor to the major" is very similar to qal v'khomer ("minor to major" also appears in a lot of philosophy arguments--it's far from Christian only). Gezerah Shavah (without calling it that), the fact that a similar case gave a certain verdict therefore the present case should render a similar verdict, will also appear frequently in Christian writings. Ka-yotze bo mi-makom acher and Davar ha-lamed me-inyano both rely on context to determine the meaning of a passage and solving difficulties between two passages. Every good Christian interpreter uses these last two.

You can almost certainly find some Christian interpreters using the other rules listed and other Jewish methods that are not part of the list of 13. I have seen Christians use gematrias and let us not forget the Christians who used the Bible Code, which relies on Akiva's belief that "nothing superfluous exists in the Torah." Rabbi Ishmael disagreed (Sifre, Numbers 112).

share|improve this answer
1  
I found a couple of places talking about Akiva's belief from the final paragraph but none of them gave a primary-source quotation that it was drawn from. Instead, they drew it from several statements which when put together come to that conclusion. In other words, they apply Binyan ab mi-shene ketubim to Akiva's teachings to determine his methodology. I find that appropriate. –  Frank Luke Jun 10 '13 at 16:29

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.