Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In John chapter 4, Jesus has a discussion with a woman of Samaria:

The woman said to him, “Sir, I perceive that you are a prophet. Our fathers worshiped on this mountain, but you say that in Jerusalem is the place where people ought to worship.”—John 4:19-20 (ESV)

She indicates that the fathers of the Samaritans worshiped on this mountain, perhaps referring to Mount Gerissim, but the Jews claimed that it was only appropriate to worship in Jerusalem.

The Samaritans were half-Jews, as I understand. As a result, the Jews and Samaritans appear to be a bit hostile toward each other. Many Jews would not travel through Samaria when going to Jerusalem from Galilee, enduring a longer journey for the sake of avoiding Samaria altogether. However, the Samaritans still held to many Jewish beliefs and customs. Indeed, they were still looking for the Messiah, as evidenced in John 4 as well, and actually acknowledged Jesus as that Messiah in the town of Sychar.

So, why did they believe it was alright to worship on Mount Gerissim rather than in Jerusalem? Was there biblical reasoning for that or merely tradition? Why was this an issue that the Samaritan woman would have brought up?

share|improve this question

migrated from christianity.stackexchange.com Mar 26 '13 at 20:27

This question came from our site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more.

I just want some clarification on why God only want to be worshiped at one place and how different religions make their relative conclusions. –  Jim Thio Mar 26 '13 at 3:11
For the sake of accuracy, it would be better to refer to Samaritans as having partial Israelite ethnicity; this would not have been primarily Jewish (if at all), but drawn from tribes of the northern kingdom. They were the remnants of the "people of the land," intermarried with the settlers from other nations whom the Assyrians transplanted among them. –  Tim Gallant Jun 1 '13 at 3:15

5 Answers 5

up vote 10 down vote accepted

This is the historical record regarding The Temple and the Samaritans from the Bible.

Moses instructed the Israelites that there should be only one place of worship.

Deuteronomy 12:8-11 (NIV)

You are not to do as we do here today, everyone doing as they see fit, since you have not yet reached the resting place and the inheritance the Lord your God is giving you. But you will cross the Jordan and settle in the land the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance, and he will give you rest from all your enemies around you so that you will live in safety. Then to the place the Lord your God will choose as a dwelling for his Name—there you are to bring everything I command you: your burnt offerings and sacrifices, your tithes and special gifts, and all the choice possessions you have vowed to the Lord.

Later King Solomon built the Temple in Jerusalem and God approved it for the one place of Worship.

1 Kings 9:3 (NIV)

The Lord said to him: “I have heard the prayer and plea you have made before me; I have consecrated this temple, which you have built, by putting my Name there forever. My eyes and my heart will always be there.

After The Kingdom of Israel was destroyed and the people were exiled to Assyria and other places, (many of the tribes of Israel were lost till today) the empty place of Samaria was occupied by foreigners, who were latter called Samaritans even at the time of Jesus.

2 Kings 17:24-29 (NIV)

The king of Assyria brought people from Babylon, Kuthah, Avva, Hamath and Sepharvaim and settled them in the towns of Samaria to replace the Israelites. They took over Samaria and lived in its towns. When they first lived there, they did not worship the Lord; so he sent lions among them and they killed some of the people. It was reported to the king of Assyria: “The people you deported and resettled in the towns of Samaria do not know what the god of that country requires. He has sent lions among them, which are killing them off, because the people do not know what he requires.” Then the king of Assyria gave this order: “Have one of the priests you took captive from Samaria go back to live there and teach the people what the god of the land requires.” 28 So one of the priests who had been exiled from Samaria came to live in Bethel and taught them how to worship the Lord. Nevertheless, each national group made its own gods in the several towns where they settled, and set them up in the shrines the people of Samaria had made at the high places.

Mount Gerazim was regarded as a place of blessing.

Deuteronomy 11:29 (NIV)

When the Lord your God has brought you into the land you are entering to possess, you are to proclaim on Mount Gerizim the blessings, and on Mount Ebal the curses.

Later, the Samaritans selected it for the Place of Worship.

See this wiki page for more on Mount Gerizim.

share|improve this answer
Good enough. Still it doesn't explain what's so special about mount Gerissim. –  Jim Thio Mar 26 '13 at 10:06
Thanks. Updated as well. –  Mawia Mar 26 '13 at 10:15
Are you trying to say that mount Gerissim becomes holy city after babylonian exile? –  Jim Thio Mar 26 '13 at 10:18
Whether Samaritan were jews or not is something I do not know either. I mean they worship jewish God and live in the same land. The jews wrote that they do so merely because God sent lions. Hmmm... That's harder for me to believe actually. –  Jim Thio Mar 27 '13 at 0:05
@Mawia, they claim not to worship any god but God; and there’s no indication that there are any remnants of their old pagan worship still around. Things might have been different 2,000 years ago; you might get some interesting information by asking about the Samaritans on ✡.SE. –  J. C. Salomon Mar 28 '13 at 1:41

D. A. Carson's commentary on John (generally considered to be the best available commentary on this book of the Bible) explains the following: (See p. 220-222)

Different Canon...

The Samaritans limited the canon to the Pentateuch. As a result, they accepted Deuteronomy 12:5 as authoritative...

But you shall seek the Lord at the place which the Lord your God will choose from all your tribes, to establish His name there for His dwelling, and there you shall come.

...but in the Samaritan textual tradition it reads slightly differently:

. . . to seek the place the Lord your God has chosen . . .

For a Samaritan, "the place" had already been chosen by God and the identity of the location would be found in the Pentateuch itself. The Jews, on the other hand, viewed the statement as forward-pointing to future revelation.

...Different Conclusions

Carson explains the Jewish interpretation as follows:

the Jew concluded Jerusalem was the place: there David determined to build a temple to God, and God solemnly authorized his son Solomon to do so. There sacrifice was divinely sanctioned, the temple site retaining its significance when Zerubbabel rebuilt it after it was destroyed, and when later still Herod embellished it.

Of course, none of this is found in the Pentateuch, and so none of this would have been convincing to a Samaritan. The Samaritans used the following Pentateuch-based logic to support their identification of "the place" as Gerizim:

  • The first place Abraham built an altar after entering the Promised Land was in Shechem, overlooked by Mount Gerizim

  • God instructed the covenant community to shout the blessings from Mount Gerizim once they had entered the promised land (Dt. 11:29-30; 27:2-7, 12)

  • Both instances of the 10 Commandments (Ex. 20:17, Dt. 5:21) in the Samaritan Bible are followed by words very similar to those found in (Dt. 27:2-7), tying the Commandments themselves to Gerizim.

share|improve this answer

Only one temple would be because God was teaching them that there was one way to worship Him, and it had to be done in the way He taught and in the place He taught. Of course, home worship and gatherings were encouraged, but there was one temple. It is similar to how, in the Tabernacle days, there was one entrance and the opening was to the east.

Also, Jewish-Samaritan relations had a long history of hostility. It began with the fact that the Samaritans were half-Jews but did not end there. During the Return, Samaritans offered to help rebuild the city but were rebuffed.


29 Now (about 9 CE) when Judea was administered by Coponius, who was sent out by Quirinius [the Roman governor of Syria]...these things occurred: During the celebration of the feast of Unleavened Bread, which we call Passover, in a custom of the priests the gates of the temple [in Jerusalem] were opened after midnight.

30 And then, when their opening first occurred, Samaritan men coming into Jerusalem in secret, began to scatter human bones in the porticoes and throughout the temple. (So, the priests), who were not accustomed to such things before, managed the temple with greater care. --- Josephus, Antiquities 18.29-30

Scattering human bones in the Temple would have defiled the Temple right at the time of a major holiday.

At another time, Samaritans sabotaged the signal fires used by Jews to signal a new month had begun. The festival dates were to be celebrated on specific days of the month, thus knowing the first day of the month was necessary. To do so, the Jews set up a system of signal fires (the same kind of signals used in the third LOTR movie). When the New Moon was observed, the signal fire at the Temple would be lit. When the watchmen at the first circle of fires saw the burning, they lit their fires. Then the second set would see the fires and light their own fire. This allowed the message to be spread quickly. To throw the dates off, Samaritans would light fires on dates that were close but not accurate. A description of this may be found in Yerushalami Rosh Hashanah 2:1. Pay attention to the footnotes if available.

share|improve this answer
Very good information. This explains the hatred between Jews and Samaritans. –  Mawia Mar 29 '13 at 5:05

The entire torah doesnt say that worship was done in jeruslalem once. And the torah has authority over the prophets since there was.never a prophet like moses. There are two instances where jews claim that jerusalem is mentioned. One is the priest of shalem who greeted abraham after he defeated the armies that came towards canaan(when he saved his nephew lot) and secondly when abraham took his son isaac to land of moriah. Now the first instance doesnt claim that abraham worshipped there . The second instance doesnt specify the particular mountain since it says land of moriah which could be a large portion. But we.know that he worshipped in the tree of moreh and the tree of mamre. One being in shechem and thw other being in hebron. Now we know hebron wouldnt be the chosen place since it was bought as a grave site which isnt holy. So we have to seek more evidence. Jacob.clearly named.the place bet el which means house of god. Since here he saw the angels. Clearly this place bet el was also the place where abraham took his son isaac in the land of moriah. Since both abraham and jacob worshipped here and this was the first place.of entrance into the land that both abraham and the nation of israel offered burnt offerings. Not jerusalem. My conclusion is simple. Like we see thatisaac was chosen over ishmael and jacob over esau in the same sense joseph was chosen over judah and ephraim over manaseh. These blessings point to the place of chosen which in my beleif is the very original garden of eden since we know the place was guarded by the ever turning cherubim. And jacob meets with one of the guards of the garden immediately before returning to bet el . He named the place penial because this is where the armies of god guard the place which is over the jordon. Josephs blessing was greatest of all and he also had two dreams of ruling over his brothers. One qas fulfilled during the time in egypt when he qas made governer . And secondly the messianic times when the king shall come fron joseph. Even jews recognize there is moshisch ben yoseph and david. More than that joseph was.given thw blessing of having the burning bush. From gerizim you can see north west and south very clearly sothis could easily fullfill the place god confirmed his covenant. And why did god single out only thesw two mountains and give strict instructoons to confirm the covenant in the land after sinai. It all makes sensw if you accept it was the original garden of eden and the chosen place of worship and god blessed israel with watching over the garden to keep its laws. Just as god commanded adam. This revelation will shake the foundations of christianity and islam and judaism and prove judah was evil from birth. All will feel great shame for their ancestors shame and really is it so suprising that judah would do such a thing. Look at the life of judah and look at the faithless generation even after witnessing all the miiracles.of egypt and sinai. They still bowed to a calf. Today we are less evil but we still inheritthe sins of our fathers who changed the place of worship.

share|improve this answer
Welcome to Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange! We're a little different from other sites. This answer isn't quite what we are looking for here. Please read this post to learn more about what we're looking for in good posts. –  Dan Dec 10 '13 at 21:27

In Josh 8:30 when Joshua builds an altar on Mount Ebal as instructed by Moses Dt27:1-4, the curses are given from Ebal. But notice, the curses and the alter are on the same Mtn. God is saying ,"I know you will sin, but I have provided a sacrifice". Mt Gerizim represents salvation by works alone. Mt. Gerizim is the Secular Humanist belief that my good works will save me, Blessings. Jesus is telling the woman at Jacob's well pointing at Mt Gerizim, "No, No, you need a sacrifice acceptable to God." Mt Ebal a shadow in the OT is Jesus, a Light unto this world.

share|improve this answer
Could you develop more information and background? For example, could you compare and contrast why the stones from the Jordan River were used on Mount Ebal with the altar?; that is, you mention Deut 27:1-4 (context of these stones from the Jordan), but you do not develop any of these ideas. –  Joseph Jun 6 '14 at 1:51

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.