Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In the first few chapters of Genesis, we see God create Adam and Eve and then tell them to reproduce.

Genesis 1:28 (NLT)

28 Then God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and multiply. Fill the earth and govern it. Reign over the fish in the sea, the birds in the sky, and all the animals that scurry along the ground.”

Then the Fall happens and Adam and Eve are banished from the Garden. The very next verse is them having sex.

Genesis 4:1 (NLT)
4 Now Adam had sexual relations with his wife, Eve, and she became pregnant. When she gave birth to Cain, she said, “With the Lord’s help, I have produced a man!”

To me, this seems to imply that Adam and Eve never had sex while in Eden, which would imply that they Fell rather quickly (like, a day or two). However, this contrasts with the serpent's use of the phrase "one day" in Genesis 3:1. Hence, I'm asking: is this implication that Adam and Eve didn't have sex until after the Fall one that's actually supported by the text?

share|improve this question

5 Answers 5

up vote 18 down vote accepted

It's clear from what we are told in the early chapters of Genesis, that we are not being given a full account of every action—the focus seems to be much more on the moral and theologically significant issues.

Given that, there is no direct textual evidence that reproduction did not happen before the fall, and given passages like Genesis 4:17, where no effort is made to explain the genealogy of Cain's wife, I think it is open to us to choose to believe either option:

17Cain knew his wife, and she conceived and bore Enoch. When he built a city, he called the name of the city after the name of his son, Enoch.ESV

The issue then becomes one of what the significance would be either way, and I think the significance is likely to be very small. Otherwise I presume we would have been told. That in itself tells us something about God and His priorities: very concerned that His glory is known, that he is obeyed and believed, and very little concerned with the things that often concern us humans the most, like who had sex with who and when (or even details, such as how long Adam and Eve enjoyed Eden before the fall).

share|improve this answer
1  
Excellent answer. However, "there is no direct textual evidence that reproduction did not happen before the fall" - it would appear that if there were children born in the Garden, this would have been related in the text and some account of them given. (Agreed: not necessarily so if it has no bearing on the subsequent story) As for the origin of Cain's wife, it seems highly unlikely that she was a child born in the Garden before The Fall - such a woman would hardly be fit to be the wife of the accursed Cain. Rabbinical tradition offers a different explanation, albeit a difficult one. –  Vector Mar 30 '14 at 1:48
1  
Of all the possible sources of Cain's wife, an older sister born before the fall is the least plausible! –  curiousdannii Aug 13 '14 at 6:25
    
@curiousdannii I'm not sure if I want to apply a metric of plausibility to any part of Gen 1-11. It doesn't seem appropriate to the genre. –  Jack Douglas Aug 13 '14 at 8:11
    
Why is plausibility not applicable to the genre? The (Hebrew) narrative is highly nuanced and laden with hints and possibilities, for a very good reason. –  Vector May 25 at 5:04
1  
@Vector of course, but curiousdannii and I were discussing the literal level, and that was the context I was commenting into! –  Jack Douglas May 26 at 16:31

Based on later identical patterns, it seems the "rest" on Day seven was the rest that Adam and Eve failed to enter into. With all that happened on Day 6, besides the fact that there would not have been time, later patterns indicate that the Land and the womb "dominion" promises were closed to Adam until he was qualified as God's ethical representative (as Noah was later). Thus, the curses upon the Land and the womb were in fact limited openings.

Tracing the significance of Land and womb "firstfruits" through the Bible in that light leads to some amazing discoveries. When Israel shed innocent blood, especially that of her offspring, God would send a famine. Cain's "Land" offering was rejected because he made it before Abel's "womb" offering. It was simply a question of timing, and the motive behind that timing.

share|improve this answer

According to the rabbinical tradition stated in the Medrashim and mentioned in Rashi's commentary on Genesis 3-1, they did have sex in the Garden.

In fact, it is related that the Serpent saw them having sex and became jealous, provoking him to bring about The Fall. The Rabbis found a hint to this idea in Genesis 3-1

And the serpent...

Which indicates a continuation of the previously related:

Now the man and his wife were both naked, but they felt no shame...

the logical implication being that they then had sex.

It appears that the verse you quoted

4 Now Adam had sexual relations with his wife,

specifies this because the sex resulted in the birth of Cain. As for the sex they had in the Garden, apparently Eve did not become pregnant as a result. (See my comment on the accepted answer).

share|improve this answer

The very idea that they did not know that they were naked, implies childlike innocence.

I think this points away from the idea that they had sex. They did not know good or evil. Sex is good as long as it is not misused, and they did not know about it until after the Fall.

God provided two commandments which were based on a divine standard. Only perfect/divine beings could have obeyed the command to multiply AND refrain from eating from the tree that would result in death.

In this sense, since Adam and Eve did NOT have divine characteristics, they were destined to Fall, so that they could "be as the gods knowing good and evil" (Gen 3:5 and Gen 3:22), so that they could "multiply and replenish the Earth".

share|improve this answer
    
I'm very grateful for your participation here. I think you can benefit a lot if you see the kind of answers that this site is looking for. This site is a little different from other sites. Be sure to visit the tour to learn more about this site. Welcome to Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange! –  Paul Vargas Feb 21 at 2:53
1  
This answer seems to wander around a little bit, but I'm curious about your take on things. I've never heard anyone claim that pre-Fall humanity was incapable of obedience to God. Given that pre-supposition, how were Adam and Eve intended to multiply and fill the earth? I think you are confusing: a) how our world consistently sins sexually, with b) sex as a stand-alone activity. At least from my perspective, there's nothing inconsistent with Adam and Eve having innocent sex in the Garden. –  mbm29414 May 26 at 17:38

In my observation , I believe the man and woman created to have dominion over the earth , were not Adam and Eve . The male and female , in my observation , were made in the image of god and had the knowledge of good and evil and there for had the carnal knowledge of desire for Intimacy. Furthermore , in that male and female (them ) had to be on the earth at the same time as a means to populate the earth ; as Adam was formed from earth and placed in the garden Eden alone and not having a wife to have been populating the earth with , in my observation Adam and Eve were not the first populates if the earth .

As made mention if in this thread , sex between Adam and Eve did not take place until after the acquiring knowledge of good and evil , it Appears that Adam and Eve did not have sex in the garden of Eden for as it appears in gneiss ; Eden was not mentioned as to be populated by Adam but till and maintained , as populating Eden would taint a holy place as a result of the acquiring of knowledge of good and evil .

I inquire about the context of the word knowledge In that the root Word refers to sexual relations between a man and a woman ( as seen in the contextual use as referred to in scriptures mentioning detail in sodom and Gomorra ) " my daughter has never known a man "

I don't believe Adam and Eve had sex in the garden and fallacies have been employed to lead thought to believe so as means prevent inquiry into if Adam and Eve were truly the first being on earth . The employment of such fallacies , I fell has hinders consideration of text excluded from inclusion in the bible for one reason or another , and it is the text , I believe , we might find the answer to questions presented .

share|improve this answer
    
Welcome to BHSE! We're a little different here, if you review our Site Directives, it will assist you in asking and answering questions. Thank you! –  Tau Jul 12 at 8:26
    
We are looking for more than just comments on this Site. If you review our Site Directives, it will assist you in crafting an answer. Thank you! –  Tau Jul 12 at 8:30

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.