Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In both 1 Timothy 1:4 and Titus 3:9 Paul warns his students against "endless genealogies." Obviously the Bible itself contains genealogies, even in the Gospels, so it seems like there must be something more going on than just people are reading these portions of Scripture - maybe a particular way of reading them? Do we know anything about the practices which the letters are warning against?

share|improve this question
    
titus is now safe from deletion. And also pastorals. –  Jon Ericson Oct 5 '12 at 15:53
    
Also, good question. I've always assumed the problem was related to the Jewish/Gentile conflicts, but I don't have any particular evidence to back that up. –  Jon Ericson Oct 5 '12 at 15:54
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Most commentators circle around the ideas that these are either Jewish genealogies or a unknown Gnostic type of genealogies that include angels. However there seems to be strong support that it was a particularly Jewish disturbance being spoken of in Timothy and Titus, as compared to say Colossians which may have been related to a mystic type of Jewish Gnosticism, somewhat like the Essenes.

The argument is made this way because in 1 Timothy there are references to Jewish Law in verses 7-19, 2 Timothy 4:4 and also in Titus 1:10, 1:14, 3:9. Furthermore in Gnostic literature the concept of angelic hierarchies and emanations are not presented as 'genealogies' per say.

Therefore assuming this was a purely Jewish debate about genealogies, possibly by the Judaisers, it was probably not related to arguing against the lineage of the Messiah, but about meaningless matters. Possibly certain people claimed to be superior or more blessed based on controversial beliefs about certain ancestries along Jewish folklore? There is really no way of knowing for sure as these precise debates do not seem to be extant in any writings.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.