Tell me more ×
Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In the following interesting article (which, regardless of whether it is right or wrong, is nevertheless an interesting viewpoint, in the sense of iron sharpening iron), the author hypothesises that the Holy Day was never meant to be changed from Sabbath to Sunday.

In the course of the article, the author specifically addresses the phrase "first day of the week" occurring in Matthew 28:1, Mark 16:2, Mark 16:9, Luke 24:1, John 20:1 and John 20:19. The hypothesis of the author is that that phrase "first day of the week" in those verses is better translated as "one of the Sabbaths" or "First Sabbath". Given that there are seven weekly Sabbaths between Passover and Pentecost, the author further hypothesises that the phrase "First Sabbath" can be taken to refer to the first weekly Sabbath after the Passover high Sabbath.

What should one think of the above hypotheses?


possible on-topic re-focusing of the question:


Should the phrase "the first Day of the week" that appears in Matthew 28:1, Mark 16:2, Luke 24:1, John 20:1 and John 20:19 be better translated "one of the Sabbaths" - as suggested in this article in which the author hypothesises that "the Sabbaths" in question are the seven mentioned in Leviticus 23:15:

‘And you shall count for yourselves from the day after the Sabbath, from the day that you brought the sheaf of the wave offering: seven Sabbaths shall be completed. NKJV

share|improve this question
2  
This question falls the wrong side of the line to be on-topic on BH in my view - it starts with an article rather than starting from a Bible text. I'd be delighted to discuss this with you in The Library and equally happy to help you refocus the question to be on-topic if you are happy to do that :-) – Jack Douglas Jul 28 '12 at 10:06
Hi Jack Douglas, thanks! I will be happy to have your help in refocusing the question. Only thing is...would it be helpful to mention the original article, as context for how this question arose...? Thanks! – user1539 Jul 29 '12 at 10:10
Great - can we talk in the chat room about my very rough suggested changes (link in my last comment)? – Jack Douglas Jul 30 '12 at 11:16

closed as off topic by Jack Douglas Jul 28 '12 at 10:06

Questions on Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange are expected to relate to the analysis of biblical text within the scope defined in the FAQ. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about closed questions here.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.